Puccini Lucrezia, Fantini Michela, Biagetti Carlo, Angelini Raffaella, Dirani Giorgio, Grumiro Laura, Schiavone Pasqua, Sparacino Monica, Semprini Simona, Sambri Vittorio, Cricca Monica
Operative Unit of Microbiology, The Great Romagna Hub Laboratory, Pievesestina, Italy.
Health Services Research, Evaluation and Policy Unit, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1130677. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1130677. eCollection 2023.
One of the major criticisms facing the research community during SARS-CoV2 pandemic was the lack of large-scale, longitudinal data on the efficacy of the SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccines. Currently, even if COVID-19 antiviral treatments have been authorized by European Medicine Agency, prevention through approved specific vaccines is the best approach available in order to contain the ongoing pandemic.
Here, we studied the antibody kinetic over a one-year period from vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech (Pfizer) vaccines and subsequent boosting with either the BioNTech or Moderna (Spikevax) vaccines in a large cohort of 8,071 healthcare workers (HCW). We also described the impact of SARS-CoV2 infection on antibody kinetic over the same period.
We assessed the - Spike kinetic by the high throughput dried blood spot (DBS) collection method and the GSP®/DELFIA® Anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG assay (PerkinElmer®).
Our data support existing models showing that SARS-CoV2 vaccination elicits strong initial antibodies responses that decline with time but are transitorily increased by administering a vaccine booster. We also showed that using heterologous vaccine/booster combinations a stronger antibody response was elicited than utilizing a booster from the same vaccine manufacturer. Furthermore, by considering the impact of SARS-CoV2 infection occurrence in proximity to the scheduled booster administration, we confirmed that booster dose did not contribute significantly to elicit higher antibody responses.
DBS sampling in our large population of HCWs was fundamental to collect a large number of specimens and to clarify the effective mRNA vaccine-induced antibody kinetic and the role of both heterologous boosters and SARS-CoV2 infection in modulating antibody responses.
在新冠病毒大流行期间,研究界面临的主要批评之一是缺乏关于新冠病毒mRNA疫苗疗效的大规模纵向数据。目前,即使新冠抗病毒治疗已获得欧洲药品管理局的批准,但通过获批的特定疫苗进行预防仍是控制当前大流行的最佳可用方法。
在此,我们研究了在8071名医护人员(HCW)的大型队列中,接种辉瑞 - 生物科技公司(Pfizer)疫苗并随后使用生物科技公司或莫德纳公司(Spikevax)疫苗进行加强接种后一年内的抗体动力学。我们还描述了新冠病毒感染对同期抗体动力学的影响。
我们通过高通量干血斑(DBS)采集方法和GSP®/DELFIA®抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG检测法(珀金埃尔默公司)评估刺突蛋白动力学。
我们的数据支持现有模型,表明接种新冠病毒疫苗会引发强烈的初始抗体反应,该反应会随时间下降,但通过接种加强针会短暂增加。我们还表明,使用异源疫苗/加强针组合比使用同一疫苗制造商的加强针引发的抗体反应更强。此外,通过考虑在计划的加强针接种附近发生新冠病毒感染的影响,我们证实加强针剂量对引发更高抗体反应的贡献不大。
在我们的大量医护人员群体中进行干血斑采样对于收集大量样本以及阐明有效的mRNA疫苗诱导的抗体动力学以及异源加强针和新冠病毒感染在调节抗体反应中的作用至关重要。