Harada Yukinori, Masuyama Taiki, Yokose Masashi, Shimizu Taro
Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Mibu, JPN.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Mibu, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 13;15(2):e34923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34923. eCollection 2023 Feb.
The aim of this case report is to describe the diagnostic pitfalls of acute coronary syndrome in patients with relatively atypical presentation and how we can prevent diagnostic errors in such a patient, particularly focusing on occupational information. A 66-year-old male, a professional taxi driver, presented with severely deteriorated chronic upper back pain on the left side. Furthermore, the upper back pain was exacerbated by changes in position. An orthopedist examined the patient and arrived at a provisional diagnosis of musculoskeletal pain. However, as the patient was concerned about his cardiopulmonary diseases, he visited another physician. Although musculoskeletal pain was still considered as the most possible diagnosis, the physician advised him additional tests for cardiovascular diseases because he had some risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and the physician thought that "taxi driving" was a high-risk occupation for cardiovascular diseases. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, and the pain abated soon after percutaneous coronary intervention. Musculoskeletal pain is very common in professional drivers, and isolated upper back pain worsened by changes in position is a characteristic of musculoskeletal disease. However, since professional drivers also have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, physicians should consider the coexistence of two types of conditions. This case underscores that if physicians could utilize occupational information to assess patients' risks, diagnostic accuracy would improve, particularly in patients presenting with atypical symptoms and signs, which are at risk of diagnostic errors.
本病例报告的目的是描述急性冠状动脉综合征在表现相对不典型的患者中的诊断陷阱,以及我们如何预防此类患者的诊断错误,尤其关注职业信息。一名66岁男性,职业为出租车司机,因左侧慢性上背部疼痛严重恶化前来就诊。此外,上背部疼痛因体位改变而加重。一名骨科医生对患者进行了检查,并初步诊断为肌肉骨骼疼痛。然而,由于患者担心自己的心肺疾病,他又去看了另一位医生。尽管肌肉骨骼疼痛仍被认为是最可能的诊断,但这位医生建议他进行心血管疾病的进一步检查,因为他有一些风险因素,如吸烟、高血压和血脂异常,而且医生认为“出租车驾驶”是心血管疾病的高风险职业。最终,患者被诊断为急性冠状动脉综合征,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后疼痛很快缓解。肌肉骨骼疼痛在职业司机中非常常见,因体位改变而加重的孤立性上背部疼痛是肌肉骨骼疾病的一个特征。然而,由于职业司机患心血管疾病的风险也较高,医生应考虑两种情况并存。该病例强调,如果医生能够利用职业信息来评估患者的风险,诊断准确性将会提高,尤其是对于那些有非典型症状和体征且有诊断错误风险的患者。