Suppr超能文献

增强型景深人工晶状体:波前塑形与衍射光学的全聚焦评估

Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.

作者信息

Schmid Ruediger, Borkenstein Andreas F

机构信息

Accuratis, Practice for Refractive Eye Surgery, Ulm, Germany.

Borkenstein and Borkenstein, Private practice at Privatklinik der Kreuzschwestern, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Biomed Hub. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):25-30. doi: 10.1159/000529234. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A new class of nondiffractive, wavefront-shaping Enhanced-Depth-of-Focus (EDoF) IOLs has been introduced very recently to cope with photic phenomena known from diffractive EDoF IOLs. We investigated the through focus modulation transfer function (MTF) of two wavefront-shaping EDoF IOLs compared to an established diffractive EDoF IOL on the optical bench. Such comparison on the optical bench had not been performed before and is of high clinical importance for the cataract surgeon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm. Apertures of 3 mm and 4.5 mm were applied.

RESULTS

For all three IOLs, two peaks showed up in the through focus MTF curves representing the primary and secondary focus. For Symfony, these peaks were most distinct. Power difference between far and intermediate focus was 1.25 D (Symfony), 1.75 D (Vivity), and 1.5 D (LuxSmart) with an aperture of 3 mm. With an aperture of 4.5 mm, only for LuxSmart, power difference diminished slightly to about 1 D, and only the MTF in the intermediate focus decreased for all lenses.

CONCLUSION

For all three IOLs, we could confirm a considerable depth of focus that was most extended for Vivity. Both new wavefront-shaping IOLs had lower values of peak MTF but a markedly more continuous through focus behavior compared to the diffractive EDoF IOL.

摘要

引言

最近引入了一类新型的非衍射、波前整形的增强景深(EDoF)人工晶状体,以应对衍射型EDoF人工晶状体中已知的光学现象。我们在光学实验台上研究了两种波前整形EDoF人工晶状体与一种已确立的衍射型EDoF人工晶状体的全聚焦调制传递函数(MTF)。此前尚未在光学实验台上进行过此类比较,这对白内障手术医生具有高度的临床重要性。

材料与方法

通过OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2成像实验台,使用ISO-2角膜和546 nm波长,对Tecnis Symfony(衍射型)以及波前整形的Acrysof IQ Vivity和LuxSmart Crystal人工晶状体(均为22 D)进行评估。采用了3 mm和4.5 mm的孔径。

结果

对于所有三种人工晶状体,全聚焦MTF曲线中均出现了两个峰值,分别代表主焦点和次焦点。对于Symfony,这些峰值最为明显。在3 mm孔径下,远焦点和中间焦点之间的焦度差分别为1.25 D(Symfony)、1.75 D(Vivity)和1.5 D(LuxSmart)。在4.5 mm孔径下,仅对于LuxSmart,焦度差略有减小至约1 D,并且所有晶状体的中间焦点处的MTF均下降。

结论

对于所有三种人工晶状体,我们都能确认其具有相当可观的景深,其中Vivity的景深扩展最大。与衍射型EDoF人工晶状体相比,两种新型波前整形人工晶状体的MTF峰值较低,但全聚焦行为明显更连续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47bb/10015109/6eff29b60268/bmh-2023-0008-0001-529234_F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验