Siemens Healthineers, Issaquah, WA.
From the Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown.
Invest Radiol. 2023 Oct 1;58(10):703-709. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000972.
Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (SWE) has been limited in breast lesion characterization due to false-negative results from artifacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate an updated Food and Drug Administration-approved breast 2D-SWE algorithm and compare with the standard algorithm (SA).
This prospective, single-center study was approved by our local institutional review board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. From April 25, 2019 to May 2, 2022, raw shear wave data were saved on patients having screening or diagnostic breast ultrasound on a Siemens Sequoia US. After removing duplicate images and those without biopsy diagnosis or stability over 2 years, there were 298 patients with 394 lesions with biopsy-proven pathology or >2-year follow-up. Raw data were processed using the SA and a new algorithm (NA). Five-millimeter regions of interest were placed in the highest stiffness in the lesion or adjacent 3 mm on the SA. Stiffness values (shear wave speed, max) in this location from both algorithms were recorded. Statistics were calculated for comparing the 2 algorithms.
The mean patient age was 56.3 ± 16.1 years (range, 21-93 years). The mean benign lesion size was 10.7 ± 8.0 mm (range, 2-46 mm), whereas the mean malignant lesion size was 14.9 ± 7.8 mm (range, 4-36 mm). There were 201 benign (>2-year follow-up) and 193 biopsied lesions (65 benign; 128 malignant). The mean maximum stiffness for benign lesions was 2.37 m/s (SD 1.26 m/s) for SA and 3.51 m/s (SD 2.05 m/s) for NA. For malignant lesions, the mean maximum stiffness was 4.73 m/s (SD, 1.71 m/s) for SA and 8.45 m/s (SD, 1.42 m/s) for NA. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 SA and 0.95 NA when using the optimal cutoff value. Using a threshold value of 5.0 m/s for NA and comparing to SA, the sensitivity increased from 0.45 to 1.00 and the specificity decreased from 0.94 to 0.81; the positive predictive value was 0.72, the negative predictive value was 1.00, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.00.
Using a new breast SWE algorithm significantly improves the sensitivity of the technique with a small decrease in specificity, virtually eliminating the "soft" cancer artifact. The new 2D-SWE algorithm significantly increases the sensitivity and negative predictive value in characterizing breast lesions as benign or malignant and allows for downgrading all BI-RADS 4 lesions.
二维剪切波弹性成像(SWE)由于伪影导致假阴性结果,在乳腺病变特征描述中受到限制。本研究旨在评估一种经过美国食品和药物管理局批准的更新的乳腺 2D-SWE 算法,并与标准算法(SA)进行比较。
这项前瞻性、单中心研究经我院当地机构审查委员会和《健康保险流通与责任法案》批准。从 2019 年 4 月 25 日至 2022 年 5 月 2 日,西门子 Sequoia US 对行筛查或诊断性乳腺超声检查的患者保存原始剪切波数据。在剔除重复图像和无活检诊断或 2 年以上随访的图像后,共有 298 例患者的 394 个病变具有活检证实的病理或 >2 年随访。使用 SA 和新算法(NA)处理原始数据。在 SA 中,在病变或相邻 3mm 处的最高硬度处放置 5mm 的感兴趣区域。记录这两种算法在该位置的硬度值(剪切波速度,最大值)。计算统计学数据以比较两种算法。
患者平均年龄为 56.3±16.1 岁(范围,21-93 岁)。良性病变的平均大小为 10.7±8.0mm(范围,2-46mm),而恶性病变的平均大小为 14.9±7.8mm(范围,4-36mm)。有 201 例良性(>2 年随访)和 193 例活检病变(65 例良性;128 例恶性)。良性病变的平均最大硬度为 SA 2.37m/s(SD 1.26m/s)和 NA 3.51m/s(SD 2.05m/s)。对于恶性病变,SA 的平均最大硬度为 4.73m/s(SD,1.71m/s),NA 的平均最大硬度为 8.45m/s(SD,1.42m/s)。使用最优截断值时,SA 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.87,NA 为 0.95。使用 NA 的 5.0m/s 截断值并与 SA 比较,敏感性从 0.45 增加到 1.00,特异性从 0.94 降低到 0.81;阳性预测值为 0.72,阴性预测值为 1.00,阴性似然比为 0.00。
使用新的乳腺 SWE 算法可显著提高技术的敏感性,特异性略有下降,几乎消除了“软”癌症伪影。新的 2D-SWE 算法可显著提高特征描述为良性或恶性的乳腺病变的敏感性和阴性预测值,并允许降级所有 BI-RADS 4 病变。