Foley M A, Aman C, Gutch D
Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1987 Dec;44(3):335-47. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(87)90038-5.
The present experiments examined the sorts of cues that might be available to facilitate children's ability to discriminate between memories for their own actions. In Experiment 1, 7 and 10 year olds engaged in two types of tracing exercises (using a pencil and a finger; a stylus and a finger; or a stylus and a pencil). Discrimination performance was better when distinguishing between memories involving the use of a pencil vs. a finger than in either of the other two cases. In Experiment 2, children traced and imagined tracing pictures using one of these three tools. Discriminations between memories for tracing and imagined tracing varied with the type of tool involved and interacted with the type of tracing activity (tracing vs. imagining). These differences in discrimination performance demonstrated the importance of kinesthetic cues and visible consequences for children's memory discriminations.
本实验考察了可能有助于儿童区分自身行为记忆的各类线索。在实验1中,7岁和10岁的儿童进行了两种类型的描摹练习(使用铅笔和手指;使用触控笔和手指;或使用触控笔和铅笔)。当区分涉及使用铅笔与手指的记忆时,辨别表现比其他两种情况中的任何一种都要好。在实验2中,儿童使用这三种工具中的一种描摹并想象描摹图片。对于描摹和想象描摹的记忆辨别因所涉及的工具类型而异,并与描摹活动的类型(描摹与想象)相互作用。辨别表现的这些差异证明了动觉线索和可见结果对儿童记忆辨别的重要性。