Suppr超能文献

源识别实证方法的评估。

An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

作者信息

Murnane K, Bayen U J

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):417-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03200931.

Abstract

Source identification refers to memory for the origin of information. A consistent nomenclature is introduced for empirical measures of source identification which are then mathematically analyzed and evaluated. The ability of the measures to assess source identification independently of identification of an item as old or new depends on assumptions made about how inconsistencies between the item and source components of a source-monitoring task may be resolved. In most circumstances, the empirical measure that is used most often when source identification is measured by collapsing across pairs of sources (sometimes called "the identification-of-origin score") confounds item identification with source identification. Alternative empirical measures are identified that do not confound item and source identification in specified circumstances. None of the empirical measures examined provides a valid measure of source identification in all circumstances.

摘要

来源识别是指对信息来源的记忆。本文引入了一套统一的术语,用于对来源识别的实证测量,随后对这些测量进行数学分析和评估。这些测量方法独立于将项目识别为旧项目或新项目来评估来源识别的能力,取决于对如何解决来源监测任务中项目与来源成分之间的不一致所做的假设。在大多数情况下,当通过合并成对来源来测量来源识别时,最常使用的实证测量方法(有时称为“来源识别分数”)会将项目识别与来源识别混淆。本文确定了在特定情况下不会混淆项目和来源识别的替代实证测量方法。所研究的实证测量方法在所有情况下都不能提供有效的来源识别测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验