Suppr超能文献

Engage with Impact 工具包的开发:支持评估患者、家庭和照护者在卫生系统中的参与度的综合资源。

Development of the Engage with Impact Toolkit: A comprehensive resource to support the evaluation of patient, family and caregiver engagement in health systems.

机构信息

Public and Patient Engagement Collaborative, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1255-1265. doi: 10.1111/hex.13742. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recent shifts in the patient, family and caregiver engagement field have focused greater attention on measurement and evaluation, including the impacts of engagement efforts. Current evaluation tools offer limited support to organizations seeking to reorient their efforts in this way. We addressed this gap through the development of an impact measurement framework and accompanying evaluation toolkit-the Engage with Impact Toolkit.

METHODS

The measurement framework and toolkit were co-designed with the Evaluating Patient Engagement Working Group, a multidisciplinary group of patient, family and caregiver partners, engagement specialists, researchers and government personnel. Project activities occurred over four phases: (1) project scoping and literature review; (2) modified concept mapping; (3) working group deliberations and (4) toolkit web design.

RESULTS

The project scope was to develop a measurement framework and an evaluation toolkit for patient engagement in health systems that were practical, accessible, menu-driven and aligned with current system priorities. Concept mapping yielded 237 impact statements that were sorted, discussed and combined into 81 unique items. A shorter list of 50 items (rated 8.0 or higher out of 10) was further consolidated to generate a final list of 35 items mapped across 8 conceptual domains of impact: (1) knowledge and skills; (2) confidence and trust; (3) equity and inclusivity; (4) priorities and decisions; (5) effectiveness and efficiency; (6) patient-centredness; (7) culture change and (8) patient outcomes and experience. Working Group members rated the final list for importance (1-5) and identified a core set of 33 items (one for each of the 8 domains and 25 supplementary items). Two domains (priorities and decisions; and culture change) yielded the highest overall importance ratings (4.8). A web-based toolkit (www.evaluateengagement.ca) hosts the measurement framework and related evaluation supports.

CONCLUSION

The Engage with Impact Toolkit builds on existing engagement evaluation tools but brings a more explicit focus to supporting organizations to assess the impacts of their engagement work.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

Patient, family and caregiver partners led the early conceptualization of this work and were involved at all stages and in all aspects of the work. As end-users of the toolkit, their perspectives, knowledge and opinions were critical.

摘要

简介

最近,患者、家庭和照护者参与领域的转变更加关注测量和评估,包括参与工作的影响。目前的评估工具在组织寻求以这种方式重新调整其工作方向方面提供的支持有限。我们通过开发影响测量框架和配套评估工具包-Engage with Impact Toolkit 来解决这一差距。

方法

该测量框架和工具包是与参与评估工作小组共同设计的,该小组是一个由患者、家庭和照护者伙伴、参与专家、研究人员和政府人员组成的多学科小组。项目活动分四个阶段进行:(1)项目范围界定和文献回顾;(2)改良概念映射;(3)工作小组审议;(4)工具包网页设计。

结果

项目范围是开发一个实用、可访问、菜单驱动且与当前系统重点保持一致的医疗系统中患者参与度的测量框架和评估工具包。概念映射产生了 237 条影响陈述,这些陈述被分类、讨论并组合成 81 个独特项目。50 个项目(10 分制中得 8.0 或以上)的列表进一步合并,生成了一个映射到 8 个影响概念领域的最终 35 个项目列表:(1)知识和技能;(2)信心和信任;(3)公平性和包容性;(4)优先事项和决策;(5)有效性和效率;(6)以患者为中心;(7)文化变革;(8)患者结果和体验。工作小组成员对最终列表的重要性(1-5)进行了评分,并确定了一套核心 33 个项目(每个领域一个,外加 25 个补充项目)。两个领域(优先事项和决策;文化变革)的总体重要性评分最高(4.8)。一个基于网络的工具包(www.evaluateengagement.ca)承载着测量框架和相关评估支持。

结论

Engage with Impact Toolkit 建立在现有的参与评估工具的基础上,但更明确地侧重于支持组织评估其参与工作的影响。

患者贡献

患者、家庭和照护者伙伴主导了这项工作的早期概念化,并参与了工作的所有阶段和各个方面。作为工具包的最终用户,他们的观点、知识和意见至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69bc/10154848/0ca4df87d327/HEX-26--g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验