Martha Faraby, Edwar Lukman, Karuniawati Anis, Fuady Ahmad, Tuasikal Ramadhiana Maktazula
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Mar 21;11(2):e0356522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03565-22.
The purpose of this study was to compare the bacterial culture results from corneal infiltrate specimens collected using two different methods, corneal scraping followed by microhomogenization and corneal swab. This is a comparative crosssectional study, with 18 participants undergoing corneal specimen collection using each of the 2 sampling techniques. The results from the scraping and swab methods were separated and then compared using data analysis. The proportion of Gram stain results that matched the culture results for the scraping-microhomogenization technique was 6/13 (46.2%), and the proportion of Gram stain results that matched the culture results for the swab technique was 5/13 (38.5%) (McNemar test value, 1.000; > 0.05). The proportion of positive cultures obtained using the scraping-microhomogenization technique was 13/18 (72.2%), and the proportion of positive cultures obtained using the swab technique was 9/18 (50%) (McNemar test value, 0.219; > 0.05). The Kappa suitability test value for comparison of the scraping-microhomogenization technique to the corneal swab was 0.333. The specimens collected by corneal scraping followed by microhomogenization had a higher positive bacterial culture rate than those collected by corneal swab, but the results were not statistically significant. This study aimed to compare the culture results between scraping specimens with microhomogenization and corneal smears in patients with moderate to severe bacterial corneal ulcers. This study could be a guideline for treating bacterial corneal ulcers.
本研究的目的是比较使用两种不同方法收集的角膜浸润标本的细菌培养结果,这两种方法分别是角膜刮片后进行微量匀浆法和角膜拭子法。这是一项比较性横断面研究,18名参与者分别使用这两种采样技术进行角膜标本采集。刮片法和拭子法的结果分开记录,然后通过数据分析进行比较。刮片-微量匀浆技术的革兰氏染色结果与培养结果相符的比例为6/13(46.2%),拭子技术的革兰氏染色结果与培养结果相符的比例为5/13(38.5%)(McNemar检验值为1.000;P>0.05)。使用刮片-微量匀浆技术获得阳性培养结果的比例为13/18(72.2%),使用拭子技术获得阳性培养结果的比例为9/18(50%)(McNemar检验值为0.219;P>0.05)。刮片-微量匀浆技术与角膜拭子法比较的Kappa适宜性检验值为0.333。角膜刮片后进行微量匀浆法收集的标本细菌培养阳性率高于角膜拭子法收集的标本,但结果无统计学意义。本研究旨在比较中重度细菌性角膜溃疡患者刮片微量匀浆标本与角膜涂片的培养结果。本研究可为细菌性角膜溃疡的治疗提供指导。