Sportklinik Stuttgart GmbH, Taubenheimstr. 8, 70372, Stuttgart, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5491-5500. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04828-8. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
In athletes, acromioclavicular joint disruptions account for up to 50% of all shoulder injuries. In high-grade injuries, surgery is favored to ensure a correct restoration of the joint, especially in young athletes. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and sport related outcomes of the arthroscopic stabilization with the fixation of the AC joint in a mini-open approach.
19 patients treated arthroscopically (ASK) and 26 patients with an acute AC-joint dislocation Rockwood V who had undergone the mini-open (MO) surgery were included. Constant Murley Score (CMS), Taft Score (TS) and the Simple Shoulder Tests (SST) were evaluated. The sports activity level was determined according to Valderrabano and the athlete's recovery of their athletic activity level after surgery according to Rhee. Furthermore, all available X-ray images were analyzed.
Patients in the ASK group achieved an average score of 11.7 ± 0.6 points in the SST, 10.3 ± 1.8 points in the TS and 91.2 ± 11.8 points in the CMS. On average, patients in the MO group achieved results of 10.5 ± 1.4 points in the SST, 11.7 ± 0.7 points in the TS and 91.6 ± 9.8 points in the CMS. The ASK group showed significant difference regarding the CC distance in side comparison (Δ = 3.6 mm), whereas no significant difference was found in the MO group (Δ = 0.8 mm). In comparison of both groups, the posterior as well as the combined translation were significantly greater in the ASK group than in the MO group (posterior: ASK: 24.8 mm, MO: 19.3 mm, combined: ASK: 29.1 mm, MO: 20.9 mm). Residual horizontal instability was greater in the ASK group (43%) than in the MO group (32%). Similar results were achieved in sports activity and the recovery of athletic activity (Valderrabano: ASK: 2.8, MO: 2.6; Rhee: ASK: 1.6, MO: 1.5).
Both techniques prove to be effective for the stabilization of high-grade AC-joint disruptions in athletes and showed excellent clinical results. From a radiographic standpoint, the mini-open procedure appears superior to the arthroscopic technique. After mini-open surgery postoperative loss of correction is less common and greater horizontal stability is achieved. The results also suggest the mini-open technique is superior to the arthroscopic procedure when aiming to restore the athlete's original level of sports activity.
在运动员中,肩锁关节脱位占所有肩部损伤的 50%。在高等级损伤中,手术是首选,以确保关节得到正确的修复,尤其是在年轻运动员中。本研究旨在比较关节镜下固定术与微型开放式固定术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位 Rockwood V 型的临床、放射学和运动相关结果。
纳入 19 例接受关节镜下(ASK)和 26 例急性肩锁关节脱位 Rockwood V 型接受微型开放式(MO)手术的患者。采用Constant Murley 评分(CMS)、Taft 评分(TS)和简单肩部测试(SST)进行评估。根据 Valderrabano 确定运动活动水平,根据 Rhee 确定运动员术后恢复运动活动水平。此外,还分析了所有可获得的 X 线图像。
ASK 组患者 SST 平均得分为 11.7±0.6 分,TS 平均得分为 10.3±1.8 分,CMS 平均得分为 91.2±11.8 分。MO 组患者 SST 平均得分为 10.5±1.4 分,TS 平均得分为 11.7±0.7 分,CMS 平均得分为 91.6±9.8 分。ASK 组在侧面对比中 CC 距离有显著差异(Δ=3.6mm),而 MO 组无显著差异(Δ=0.8mm)。两组比较,ASK 组的后向和联合移位明显大于 MO 组(后向:ASK:24.8mm,MO:19.3mm,联合:ASK:29.1mm,MO:20.9mm)。ASK 组残余水平不稳定度(43%)大于 MO 组(32%)。在运动活动和运动能力恢复方面,两组结果相似(Valderrabano:ASK:2.8,MO:2.6;Rhee:ASK:1.6,MO:1.5)。
两种技术均可有效稳定运动员高等级肩锁关节脱位,临床效果均极佳。从影像学角度来看,微型开放式手术优于关节镜技术。微型开放式手术后,术后矫正丢失较少,水平稳定性更高。结果还表明,当旨在恢复运动员原有运动水平时,微型开放式手术优于关节镜手术。