School of Science and Techonology, Cape Breton University, Sydney, NS, B1P 6L2, Canada.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 21;13(1):1040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26872-x.
Habitat loss and fragmentation are major drivers of global pollinator declines, yet even after recent unprecedented periods of anthropogenic land-use intensification the amount of habitat needed to support insect pollinators remains unknown. Here we use comprehensive pan trap bee survey datasets from Ontario, Canada, to determine which habitat types are needed and at what spatial scales to support wild bee communities. Safeguarding wild bee communities in a Canadian landscape requires 11.6-16.7% land-cover from a diverse range of habitats (~ 2.6-3.7 times current policy guidelines) to provide targeted habitat prescriptions for different functional guilds over a variety of spatial scales, irrespective of whether conservation aims are enhancing bee species richness or abundance. Sensitive and declining habitats, like tallgrass woodlands and wetlands, were important predictors of bee biodiversity. Conservation strategies that under-estimate the extent of habitat, spatial scale and specific habitat needs of functional guilds are unlikely to protect bee communities and the essential pollination services they provide to both crops and wild plants.
生境丧失和破碎化是全球传粉媒介减少的主要驱动因素,但即使在最近人类土地利用强度空前增加的时期之后,支持昆虫传粉媒介所需的生境数量仍不清楚。在这里,我们使用来自加拿大安大略省的全面的 Pan 陷阱蜜蜂调查数据集,确定需要哪些生境类型以及在什么空间尺度上支持野生蜜蜂群落。要在加拿大景观中保护野生蜜蜂群落,需要从各种生境(~2.6-3.7 倍于当前政策指南)中获得 11.6-16.7%的土地覆盖,以提供针对不同功能类群的有针对性的生境处方,无论保护目标是提高蜜蜂物种丰富度还是丰度。敏感和衰退的栖息地,如高草林地和湿地,是蜜蜂生物多样性的重要预测因子。保护策略如果低估了功能类群的生境、空间尺度和特定生境需求的范围,就不太可能保护蜜蜂群落及其为作物和野生植物提供的重要授粉服务。