Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间心理健康工作者人文关怀能力及其维度的影响因素:一项在线横断面研究。

Influencing factors of humanistic care ability and its dimensions among mental health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Department, Jinzi Mountain Hospital of Chongqing Mental Health Center, No.102, Jinzi Mountain, Jiangbei District, Chongqing, 401147, China.

Nursing College of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 21;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04656-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In psychiatric services, humanistic care ability significantly affects the quality of the therapeutic relationship and thus affects the therapeutic outcomes for patients. Mental health workers may be confronted with more obstacles in humanistic care during the COVID-19 pandemic wherethe authors aimed to explore the capacity level of humanistic care among mental health workers and its potential influencing factors.

METHOD(S): An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 262 mental health workers working in Chongqing, China, from December 2020 to January 2021. Data were collected by the Caring Ability Inventory (CAI), the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised, and the Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of humanistic care ability.

RESULTS

Mental health workers' humanistic care ability is at a low level, with a score of 186.47 ± 21.34. Psychological capital is positively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = 0.41 [0.46-0.77], p < 0.001), and its two dimensions (cognition: β[95%CI] = 0.51 [0.30-0.47], p < 0.001; patience: β[95%CI] = 0.48 [0.17-0.28], p < 0.001). Psychoticism is negatively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = -0.28 [-5.18 - -2.51], p < 0.001) and its three dimensions (cognition: β[95%CI] = -0.12 [-1.57 - -0.17], p < 0.05; courage: β[95%CI] = -0.17 [-1.7 - -0.32], p < 0.01; patience: β[95%CI] = -0.19 [-1.33 - -0.36], p < 0.01). Extroversion is positively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = 0.19 [0.69-2.08], p < 0.001), and its two dimensions (cognition: β[95%CI] = 0.19 [0.32-1.05], p < 0.001; courage: β[95%CI] = 0.27 [0.5-1.23], p < 0.001). Neuroticism is negatively associated with humanistic care ability (β[95%CI] = -0.13[-1.37 - -0.19], p < 0.01) and its one dimension (courage: β[95%CI] = -0.25 [-0.98 - -0.35], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION(S): The research has found that the humanistic care ability of mental health workers is at a low level, and the psychological capital and personality traits are significant factors influencing the humanistic care ability and its sub-dimensions. Interventions to improve the psychological capital of mental health workers or to promote the change of personality traits they want are recommended, thereby to promote humanistic practice.

摘要

背景

在精神科服务中,人文关怀能力显著影响治疗关系的质量,进而影响患者的治疗效果。精神卫生工作者在 COVID-19 大流行期间可能在人文关怀方面面临更多障碍。本研究旨在探讨精神卫生工作者的人文关怀能力水平及其潜在影响因素。

方法

本研究于 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月,采用方便抽样法选取中国重庆市 262 名精神卫生工作者进行在线横断面调查。采用关怀能力量表(CAI)、心理资本问卷(PCQ-24)、艾森克人格问卷修订版(EPQ-RSC)和短式中国版艾森克人格问卷(EPQ-RSC)收集数据。采用多元线性回归分析探讨人文关怀能力的影响因素。

结果

精神卫生工作者的人文关怀能力处于较低水平,得分为 186.47±21.34。心理资本与人文关怀能力呈正相关(β[95%CI] = 0.41[0.46-0.77],p<0.001),其两个维度(认知:β[95%CI] = 0.51[0.30-0.47],p<0.001;耐心:β[95%CI] = 0.48[0.17-0.28],p<0.001)也是如此。精神病态与人文关怀能力呈负相关(β[95%CI] = -0.28[-5.18- -2.51],p<0.001)及其三个维度(认知:β[95%CI] = -0.12[-1.57- -0.17],p<0.05;勇气:β[95%CI] = -0.17[-1.7- -0.32],p<0.01;耐心:β[95%CI] = -0.19[-1.33- -0.36],p<0.01)也是如此。外向性与人文关怀能力呈正相关(β[95%CI] = 0.19[0.69-2.08],p<0.001)及其两个维度(认知:β[95%CI] = 0.19[0.32-1.05],p<0.001;勇气:β[95%CI] = 0.27[0.5-1.23],p<0.001)也是如此。神经质与人文关怀能力呈负相关(β[95%CI] = -0.13[-1.37- -0.19],p<0.01)及其一个维度(勇气:β[95%CI] = -0.25[-0.98- -0.35],p<0.001)也是如此。

结论

本研究发现,精神卫生工作者的人文关怀能力处于较低水平,心理资本和人格特质是影响人文关怀能力及其子维度的重要因素。建议通过干预提高精神卫生工作者的心理资本或促进他们期望的人格特质的改变,从而促进人文关怀实践。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验