Suppr超能文献

右半结肠癌根治术中淋巴结检出数:开放手术、腹腔镜手术与机器人手术的比较。

Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

机构信息

Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;19(10):888-894. doi: 10.1111/codi.13786.

Abstract

AIM

Studies have demonstrated a relationship between lymph node (LN) yield and survival after colectomy for cancer. The impact of surgical technique on LN yield has not been well explored.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study of right colectomy (RC) for cancer at a single institution from 2012 to 2014. Exclusion criteria were previous colectomy and emergent and palliative operations. All data were collected by chart review. Primary outcomes were LN yield and the LN to length of surgical specimen (LN-LSS) ratio. Multivariable mixed models were created with surgeon and pathologist as random effects. Sensitivity analyses were performed to exclude Stage IV cancers and to analyse groups on an 'as-treated' basis.

RESULTS

We identified 181 open (O-RC), 163 laparoscopic (L-RC) and 119 robotic (R-RC) right colectomies. O-RC was more commonly performed in women with metastatic disease. The mean LN yield was 28, 29 and 34 in O-RC, L-RC and R-RC, respectively; the respective mean LN-LSS ratios were 0.83, 0.91 and 1.0. The R-RC approach produced a higher LN yield than the other approaches (P < 0.01), and a higher LN-LSS ratio than O-RC (P < 0.01). These findings were unchanged in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Robotic right colectomy improves LN yield and the LN-LSS ratio, which may reflect better mesocolic excision. The effect of these findings on survival requires further investigation.

摘要

目的

研究表明,淋巴结(LN)产量与癌症根治性结肠切除术的生存之间存在关联。但外科技术对 LN 产量的影响尚未得到充分探讨。

方法

这是对 2012 年至 2014 年在一家机构进行的右半结肠癌切除术(RC)的回顾性研究。排除标准为既往结肠切除术和急诊及姑息性手术。所有数据均通过病历回顾收集。主要结局指标为 LN 产量和 LN 与手术标本长度(LN-LSS)之比。使用外科医生和病理学家作为随机效应创建多变量混合模型。进行敏感性分析以排除 IV 期癌症,并对按“实际处理”分组进行分析。

结果

共确定了 181 例开腹(O-RC)、163 例腹腔镜(L-RC)和 119 例机器人(R-RC)右半结肠切除术。O-RC 更多地用于患有转移性疾病的女性。O-RC、L-RC 和 R-RC 的平均 LN 产量分别为 28、29 和 34,相应的平均 LN-LSS 比值分别为 0.83、0.91 和 1.0。与其他方法相比,R-RC 方法产生的 LN 产量更高(P<0.01),并且 LN-LSS 比值也更高(P<0.01)。在敏感性分析中,这些发现保持不变。

结论

机器人右半结肠切除术提高了 LN 产量和 LN-LSS 比值,这可能反映了更好的横结肠系膜切除。这些发现对生存的影响需要进一步研究。

相似文献

6
Robotic Extended Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymph Node Dissection.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3990-3991. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07692-2. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
8
Robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and indocyanine green guidance.
Minerva Chir. 2019 Apr;74(2):165-169. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07831-8. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (ECM) for adenocarcinoma (with video).
J Visc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(2):157-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Is Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision Feasible for Transverse Colon Cancer?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1443-1450. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0239. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Colorectal Cancer Management.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79570. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79570. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 10;86(10):5744-5749. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence.
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 11;18(1):116. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01862-5.
7
Macroscopic Evaluation of Colon Cancer Resection Specimens.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;15(16):4116. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164116.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Mar;18(1):20-30. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.120960. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with 'conventional' colonic cancer surgery.
Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):581-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10083. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
2
[Prolongation of disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer].
Chirurg. 2015 Apr;86(4):379-80. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-3016-y.
3
A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.
J Surg Res. 2015 May 15;195(2):465-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
Lymph node yield after colectomy for cancer: is absence of mismatch repair a factor?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar;58(3):288-93. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000262.
6
Extent of surgery in cancer of the colon: is more better?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):132-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.132.
9
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2288-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3614-9. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验