Wright A F, Perini A F
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Apr;37(297):164-7.
A 10% random sample comprising 234 adults attending a general practitioner was studied to obtain an estimate of conspicuous and hidden psychiatric morbidity and to determine the value of the general health questionnaire in improving case recognition in general practice. Patients completed the 28-item general health questionnaire before seeing the general practitioner, who completed a rating sheet without seeing the general health questionnaire score. The doctor identified a psychiatric component in 38% of men and 53% of women and diagnosed psychiatric disorder in 22% of men and 31% of women. Using a cut off point of nine or above, high general health questionnaire scores were found in 25% of men and 29% of women. Agreement between the general health questionnaire and the doctor's assessment was better for males (misclassification rate 16%) than for females (20%). A subsample of patients scoring over the recommended threshold (five or above) on the general health questionnaire were interviewed by the psychiatrist to compare the case detection of the general practitioner, an independent psychiatric assessment and the 28-item general health questionnaire at two different cut-off scores. The general health questionnaire may be a useful tool for improving recognition of psychiatric morbidity in general practice if the cut-off point is raised above that recommended for epidemiological research.
对一个由234名就诊于全科医生的成年人组成的10%随机样本进行了研究,以估计明显和隐匿的精神疾病发病率,并确定一般健康问卷在改善全科医疗中病例识别方面的价值。患者在见到全科医生之前完成了28项的一般健康问卷,而全科医生在未看到一般健康问卷得分的情况下填写了一份评分表。医生在38%的男性和53%的女性中识别出精神疾病成分,在22%的男性和31%的女性中诊断出精神疾病。以9分及以上为临界值,发现25%的男性和29%的女性一般健康问卷得分较高。一般健康问卷与医生评估之间的一致性在男性中(错误分类率16%)比在女性中(20%)更好。对在一般健康问卷上得分超过推荐阈值(5分及以上)的患者子样本,精神科医生进行了访谈,以比较全科医生、独立精神科评估以及在两个不同临界值下的28项一般健康问卷的病例检出情况。如果将临界值提高到高于流行病学研究推荐的水平,一般健康问卷可能是改善全科医疗中精神疾病识别的有用工具。