Kelly M J
Bristol Royal Infirmary.
J R Soc Med. 1987 Oct;80(10):624-6. doi: 10.1177/014107688708001008.
A 'revision quiz' using some 20 projected photographic slides and a structured open-ended answer sheet was administered to, and marked for, 75 Final MB candidates and 7 Final FRCS candidates at Bristol. Despite only a modest exposure to specialist urological teaching, the undergraduates were judged to have achieved an acceptable level of performance in most areas except for treatment of urinary infections. The performance of the senior house officers was not better than that of the undergraduates. Nearly all candidates in both groups undermarked their own scripts compared to the marks given by their teachers, thus fuelling, perhaps needlessly, their anxieties about examinations.
我们使用约20张投影照片幻灯片和一份结构化的开放式答卷,对布里斯托尔的75名医学学士最后一年考生和7名皇家外科学院会员(FRCS)考生进行了一次“复习测验”并打分。尽管本科生接受的专科泌尿外科教学不多,但除了尿路感染的治疗外,他们在大多数领域的表现被判定达到了可接受的水平。高级住院医师的表现并不比本科生好。与老师给出的分数相比,两组中几乎所有考生给自己的答卷打分都偏低,这或许不必要地加剧了他们对考试的焦虑。