Bouchard St-Amant Pier-André, Tchokouagueu Franck Aurelien, Dumais Guillaume
École nationale d'administration publique (ENAP), Canada.
École nationale d'administration publique (ENAP) and Université de Sherbrooke, Canada.
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 8;9(3):e14366. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14366. eCollection 2023 Mar.
We provide a theoretical and empirical analysis of an efficient sharing of public and private flood-risk mitigation. Our analysis examines how individuals in a floodplain can best protect their property, given the interdependence between the public offering of structural measures and a private offering of insurance. A key theoretical finding is a separation of the risk space: under a given damage threshold, the public sector mitigates all risk, while above the threshold, the private sector offers insurance. We estimate this theory based on the Lake Champlain and Richelieu River data. We show how a public and private mix increases welfare gains and reduces overall spending on risk mitigation measures.
我们对公共和私人防洪减灾的有效分担进行了理论和实证分析。我们的分析考察了在洪泛区的个人如何在结构性措施的公共提供与保险的私人提供之间的相互依存关系下,最好地保护其财产。一个关键的理论发现是风险空间的分离:在给定的损害阈值下,公共部门减轻所有风险,而在阈值之上,私人部门提供保险。我们基于尚普兰湖和黎塞留河的数据对这一理论进行了估计。我们展示了公共和私人混合模式如何增加福利收益并减少防洪减灾措施的总体支出。