• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这种肉类还是那种替代品?当目标冲突时,男性气质压力如何影响食物选择。

This meat or that alternative? How masculinity stress influences food choice when goals are conflicted.

作者信息

Leary R Bret, MacDonnell Mesler Rhiannon, Montford William J, Chernishenko Jennifer

机构信息

College of Business, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.

Dhillon School of Business, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 7;10:1111681. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1111681. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2023.1111681
PMID:36960205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10028087/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This research integrates literature on masculinity stress-the distress experienced as the result of a perceived discrepancy with male gender norms-with research on goal conflict to examine preferences for plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs). Men experiencing masculinity stress are likely to hold salient a goal of being masculine, which should lead to less preference for PBMAs. However, many of these men simultaneously hold competing goals, such as making ethical food choices, which remain inhibited in favor of the focal masculinity goal. We argue that once men experiencing masculinity stress highlight their masculinity through the selection of a manly product, they satisfy that higher-order goal and are then free to pursue previously inhibited goals, such as making an ethical choice through the selection of PBMAs.

METHODS

We present the results of three studies supporting these expectations. Study 1 tests the link between masculinity stress and meat (alternative) consumption using consumer search behavior collected from Google Trends, showing that masculinity stress is positively (negatively) correlated with searches for red meat (PBMAs). Study 2 shows that men experiencing masculinity stress are more inclined to choose PBMAs, provided they are presented within a masculine product context. Study 3 presents a parallel mediation model, showing that ethical considerations (as opposed to masculine goals) shape the choice of PBMA preference.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We conclude with a discussion of theoretical implications for the impression management strategies utilized by men experiencing masculinity stress and practical implications for the growing PBMA industry.

摘要

引言

本研究将关于男性气质压力(即因感知到与男性性别规范存在差异而产生的苦恼)的文献与目标冲突研究相结合,以考察对植物性肉类替代品(PBMA)的偏好。经历男性气质压力的男性可能突出表现出追求男子气概的目标,这会导致他们对PBMA的偏好降低。然而,这些男性中的许多人同时持有相互竞争的目标,比如做出符合道德的食物选择,但这些目标仍因优先考虑男子气概目标而受到抑制。我们认为,一旦经历男性气质压力的男性通过选择具有男子气概的产品来凸显自己的男子气概,他们就满足了那个更高层次的目标,进而能够自由地追求之前受到抑制的目标,比如通过选择PBMA做出符合道德的选择。

方法

我们展示了三项支持这些预期的研究结果。研究1使用从谷歌趋势收集的消费者搜索行为来测试男性气质压力与肉类(替代品)消费之间的联系,结果表明男性气质压力与红肉搜索量呈正相关(与PBMA搜索量呈负相关)。研究2表明,经历男性气质压力的男性更倾向于选择PBMA,前提是它们出现在具有男子气概的产品情境中。研究3提出了一个平行中介模型,表明道德考量(而非男子气概目标)塑造了对PBMA的偏好选择。

结果与讨论

我们最后讨论了经历男性气质压力的男性所采用的印象管理策略的理论意义,以及对不断发展的PBMA行业的实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fbe/10028087/caf6db54bc4b/fnut-10-1111681-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fbe/10028087/caf6db54bc4b/fnut-10-1111681-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fbe/10028087/caf6db54bc4b/fnut-10-1111681-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
This meat or that alternative? How masculinity stress influences food choice when goals are conflicted.这种肉类还是那种替代品?当目标冲突时,男性气质压力如何影响食物选择。
Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 7;10:1111681. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1111681. eCollection 2023.
2
The impact of masculinity stress on preferences and willingness-to-pay for red meat.男性气质压力对红肉偏好及支付意愿的影响。
Appetite. 2022 Apr 1;171:105729. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105729. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
3
Game changers for meat and masculinity? Male athletes' perspectives on mixed and plant-based diets.肉食和男性气质的改变者?男性运动员对混合饮食和植物性饮食的看法。
Appetite. 2023 Aug 1;187:106585. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106585. Epub 2023 May 8.
4
Food essentialism is associated with perceptions of plant-based meat alternatives possessing properties of meat-based products.食物本质主义与认为植物性肉类替代品具有肉类产品特性的观念相关联。
Food Qual Prefer. 2025 Feb;123. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105328. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
Are novel plant-based meat alternatives the healthier choice?新型植物基肉类替代品是更健康的选择吗?
Food Res Int. 2024 May;183:114184. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114184. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
6
Novel plant-based meat alternatives: future opportunities and health considerations.新型植物基肉类替代品:未来的机遇和健康考虑。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2023 Sep;82(3):370-385. doi: 10.1017/S0029665123000034. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
7
Most plant-based meat alternative buyers also buy meat: an analysis of household demographics, habit formation, and buying behavior among meat alternative buyers.大多数植物肉替代食品的购买者也会购买肉类:对购买植物肉替代食品的家庭人口统计学、习惯形成和购买行为的分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16996-5.
8
Plant-based meat alternatives in South Africa: An analysis of products on supermarket shelves.南非的植物性肉类替代品:对超市货架上产品的分析。
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov 6;12(1):627-637. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3765. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Impression management and food intake. Current directions in research.印象管理与食物摄入。当前研究方向。
Appetite. 2015 Mar;86:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
10
The potential renal acid load of plant-based meat alternatives.植物性肉类替代品的潜在肾酸负荷。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Aug;78(8):732-735. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01434-8. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Polish Consumers' Attachment to Meat: Food and Plant-Based Meat Alternative Choices.波兰消费者对肉类的喜爱:食品与植物性肉类替代品的选择
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 11;17(8):1332. doi: 10.3390/nu17081332.
2
Collaboration among governments, agribusinesses, and rural households for improving the effectiveness of conservation tillage technology adoption.政府、农业综合企业和农村家庭之间开展合作,以提高保护性耕作技术采用的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83827-0.
3
Masculinity, Meat, and Veg*nism: A Scoping Review.男性气质、肉类与素食主义:范围综述。

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of masculinity stress on preferences and willingness-to-pay for red meat.男性气质压力对红肉偏好及支付意愿的影响。
Appetite. 2022 Apr 1;171:105729. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105729. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Gender differences in meat consumption and openness to vegetarianism.性别差异与肉类消费和对素食主义的接受程度。
Appetite. 2021 Nov 1;166:105475. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105475. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production.植物基和细胞基的肉类生产方法。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Mar-Apr;18(2):15579883241247173. doi: 10.1177/15579883241247173.
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):6276. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y.
4
A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat.关于消费者对替代蛋白质接受度的系统评价:豆类、藻类、昆虫、植物性肉类替代品和培养肉。
Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105058. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Associations of Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, or Fish Intake With Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality.加工肉类、未加工的红肉类、禽类或鱼类摄入量与心血管疾病事件和全因死亡率的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):503-512. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6969.
6
Meat and masculinities. Can differences in masculinity predict meat consumption, intentions to reduce meat and attitudes towards vegetarians?肉类与男子气概。男子气概的差异能否预测肉类消费、减少肉类消费的意愿和对素食者的态度?
Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104559. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104559. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
7
Can Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Be Part of a Healthy and Sustainable Diet?植物性肉类替代品能否成为健康且可持续饮食的一部分?
JAMA. 2019 Oct 22;322(16):1547-1548. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13187.
8
Diet and colorectal cancer in UK Biobank: a prospective study.英国生物银行的饮食与结直肠癌:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):246-258. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz064.
9
"Becoming the man you always wanted to be": Exploring the representation of health and masculinity in Men's Health magazine.“成为你一直想成为的男人”:探索《男性健康》杂志中健康与男性气质的呈现
Health Promot J Austr. 2018 Dec;29(3):243-250. doi: 10.1002/hpja.204. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Jerkies, tacos, and burgers: Subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference.肉干、玉米卷和汉堡:主观社会经济地位与肉类偏好。
Appetite. 2019 Jan 1;132:257-266. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.027. Epub 2018 Aug 29.