Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16996-5.
The promise of novel plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) to lessen the health and environmental impacts of meat consumption ultimately depend on market acceptance and the extent to which they displace meat in consumers' diets. We use household scanner data to provide an in-depth analysis of consumers' PBMA buying behaviors. PBMAs buyers tend to be young, single, female, college educated, employed, higher income, and non-white. About 20% of consumers purchased a PBMA at least once, and 12% purchased a PBMA on multiple occasions. About 2.79% of households only purchased PBMAs. About 86% of PBMA buyers also bought ground meat; however, PBMA buyers spent about 13% less on ground meat. Interestingly, after a household's first PBMA purchase, ground meat consumption did not fall. The number of households buying a PBMA for the first time fell over the two year period studied, despite the increase in market share in the ground meat market.
新型植物性肉类替代品(PBMAs)有望减轻肉类消费对健康和环境的影响,但这最终取决于市场接受度以及它们在消费者饮食中替代肉类的程度。我们使用家庭扫描器数据对消费者购买 PBMAs 的行为进行了深入分析。PBMAs 的购买者往往年轻、单身、女性、受过大学教育、有工作、收入较高且为非裔或拉丁裔。约 20%的消费者至少购买过一次 PBMAs,12%的消费者多次购买 PBMAs。约 2.79%的家庭只购买 PBMAs。约 86%的 PBMAs 购买者也购买碎肉;然而,他们在碎肉上的花费减少了约 13%。有趣的是,在家庭首次购买 PBMAs 后,碎肉的消费量并没有下降。尽管在研究期间碎肉市场的市场份额有所增加,但首次购买 PBMAs 的家庭数量却在减少。