Qiu Yuhao, Li Ying, Chen Zhenzhou, Chai Ninghui, Liang Xianping, Zhang Dahong, Wei Zhengqiang
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 7;10:1141672. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1141672. eCollection 2023.
The incidence of rectal cancer is increasing each year. Robotic surgery is being used more frequently in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer; however, several problems associated with robotic surgery persist, such as docking the robot repeatedly to perform auxiliary incisions and difficulty exposing the operative field of obese patients. Herein we introduce a new technology that effectively improves the operability and convenience of robotic rectal surgery.
To simplify the surgical procedure, enhance operability, and improve healing of the surgical incision, we developed an advance incision (AI) technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal anterior resection, and compared its safety and feasibility with those of intraoperative incision.
Between January 2016 and October 2021, 102 patients with rectal cancer underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal anterior resection with an AI or intraoperative incision (iOI) incisions. We compared the perioperative, incisional, and oncologic outcomes between groups.
No significant differences in the operating time, blood loss, time to first passage of flatus, time to first passage of stool, duration of hospitalization, and rate of overall postoperative complications were observed between groups. The mean time to perform auxiliary incisions was shorter in the AI group than in the iOI group (14.14 vs. 19.77 min; < 0.05). The average incision length was shorter in the AI group than in the iOI group (6.12 vs. 7.29 cm; < 0.05). Postoperative incision pain (visual analogue scale) was lower in the AI group than in the iOI group (2.5 vs. 2.9 = 0.048). No significant differences in incision infection, incision hematoma, incision healing time, and long-term incision complications, including incision hernia and intestinal obstruction, were observed between groups. The recurrence (AI group vs. iOI group = 4.0% vs. 5.77%) and metastasis rates (AI group vs. iOI group = 6.0% vs. 5.77%) of cancer were similar between groups.
The advance incision is a safe and effective technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal anterior resection, which simplifies the surgical procedure, enhances operability, and improves healing of the surgical incision.
直肠癌的发病率逐年上升。机器人手术在直肠癌的外科治疗中应用越来越频繁;然而,与机器人手术相关的几个问题仍然存在,例如反复对接机器人以进行辅助切口以及肥胖患者手术视野暴露困难。在此,我们介绍一种有效提高机器人直肠癌手术可操作性和便利性的新技术。
为简化手术过程、提高可操作性并促进手术切口愈合,我们开发了一种用于机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠前切除术的预切口(AI)技术,并将其安全性和可行性与术中切口进行比较。
2016年1月至2021年10月,102例直肠癌患者接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠前切除术,采用AI或术中切口(iOI)。我们比较了两组的围手术期、切口和肿瘤学结果。
两组在手术时间、失血量、首次排气时间、首次排便时间、住院时间和术后总体并发症发生率方面均未观察到显著差异。AI组进行辅助切口的平均时间比iOI组短(14.14对19.77分钟;<0.05)。AI组的平均切口长度比iOI组短(6.12对7.29厘米;<0.05)。AI组术后切口疼痛(视觉模拟评分)低于iOI组(2.5对2.9 = 0.048)。两组在切口感染、切口血肿、切口愈合时间以及包括切口疝和肠梗阻在内的长期切口并发症方面均未观察到显著差异。两组癌症的复发率(AI组对iOI组 = 4.0%对5.77%)和转移率(AI组对iOI组 = 6.0%对5.77%)相似。
预切口是一种用于机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠前切除术的安全有效的技术,它简化了手术过程,提高了可操作性,并促进了手术切口的愈合。