• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交叉性政策制定工具包:服务于不同妇女、儿童和家庭的交叉性知情政策制定过程的关键原则。

Intersectionality Policymaking Toolkit: Key Principles for an Intersectionality-Informed Policymaking Process to Serve Diverse Women, Children, and Families.

机构信息

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):623-635. doi: 10.1177/15248399231160447. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1177/15248399231160447
PMID:36960782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10445436/
Abstract

Health and economic inequities among U.S. racial/ethnic minority women and children are staggering. These inequities underscore a dire need for intersectionality-informed, social-justice-oriented maternal and child (MCH) policies and programs for U.S. women and children. In response, we developed the "Intersectionality Policymaking Toolkit: Key Principles for an Intersectionality Informed Policymaking Process to Serve Diverse Women, Children and Families" to assist U.S. policymakers/aides, practitioners, and other stakeholders in developing more equitable MCH policies/programs. This article describes the Toolkit development process and initial assessments of acceptability and feasibility for use in MCH policymaking. Between 2018 and 2021, we utilized the process that the World Health Organization (WHO) used to develop its WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to develop the content (e.g., case studies) and format (i.e., structure), make strategic decisions (e.g., core items, primary audiences, timing of utilization), test concepts, and receive feedback. We convened a 2-day planning meeting with experts (n = 8) in intersectionality, policymaking, and MCH to draft the Toolkit. Next, we convened half-day workshops with policymaking and program leadership and staff in Washington, DC, New Orleans, LA, and Santa Fe, NM, to refine the Toolkit (n = 37). Then we conducted an initial assessment of the Toolkits' acceptability and feasibility using surveys (n = 21), followed by focus groups (n = 7). The resulting Toolkit distills Critical Race Theory's and intersectionality's most critical elements into a user-friendly modality to promote and enhance equitable MCH policies and programs for diverse U.S. women and families.

摘要

美国少数族裔妇女和儿童的健康和经济不平等现象令人震惊。这些不平等现象突显了迫切需要制定具有交叉性意识、以社会公正为导向的母婴健康(MCH)政策和方案,以满足美国妇女和儿童的需求。有鉴于此,我们开发了“交叉性决策工具包:服务多样化的妇女、儿童和家庭的交叉性决策过程的关键原则”,以帮助美国政策制定者/助手、从业者和其他利益相关者制定更加公平的 MCH 政策/方案。本文描述了工具包的开发过程以及在 MCH 决策制定中使用的可接受性和可行性的初步评估。在 2018 年至 2021 年期间,我们利用世界卫生组织(WHO)制定其世卫组织手术安全清单所使用的过程来开发内容(例如,案例研究)和格式(即结构),做出战略决策(例如,核心项目、主要受众、利用时间),测试概念并接收反馈。我们与交叉性、决策制定和母婴健康方面的专家(n=8)举行了为期两天的规划会议,起草了工具包。接下来,我们在华盛顿特区、新奥尔良和圣达菲举行了为期半天的研讨会,有决策制定和项目领导以及工作人员参加(n=37),以完善工具包。然后,我们使用调查(n=21)和焦点小组(n=7)对工具包的可接受性和可行性进行了初步评估。最终的工具包将关键种族理论和交叉性的最关键要素提炼成一种用户友好的模式,以促进和加强美国多样化的妇女和家庭的公平 MCH 政策和方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf3/10445436/7da2c064694d/nihms-1915840-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf3/10445436/52261cf7636b/nihms-1915840-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf3/10445436/7da2c064694d/nihms-1915840-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf3/10445436/52261cf7636b/nihms-1915840-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf3/10445436/7da2c064694d/nihms-1915840-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Intersectionality Policymaking Toolkit: Key Principles for an Intersectionality-Informed Policymaking Process to Serve Diverse Women, Children, and Families.交叉性政策制定工具包:服务于不同妇女、儿童和家庭的交叉性知情政策制定过程的关键原则。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):623-635. doi: 10.1177/15248399231160447. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
The intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: demonstrating utility through application to the pre-vaccine U.S. COVID-19 policy response.基于交叉性的政策分析框架:通过应用于美国疫苗前 COVID-19 政策应对来展示其实用性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;11:1040851. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1040851. eCollection 2023.
3
Enhancing evidence use in public health nutrition policymaking: theoretical insights from a New Zealand case study.加强公共卫生营养政策制定中的证据应用:来自新西兰案例研究的理论见解
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 25;14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0154-8.
4
The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health.短语“女性和少数族裔:交叉性——公共卫生的一个重要理论框架”存在问题。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1267-73. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750. Epub 2012 May 17.
5
Intersecting gender identity and racial/ethnic inequities in eating disorder risk factors, symptoms, and diagnosis among U.S. college students: An intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy.美国大学生饮食障碍风险因素、症状和诊断中性别认同与种族/民族不平等的交叉:个体异质性和歧视准确性的交叉多水平分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Jan;57(1):146-161. doi: 10.1002/eat.24089. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
Transforming injury prevention for youth (TrIPY): an intersectionality model for youth injury prevention.转化青少年伤害预防(TrIPY):青少年伤害预防的交叉性模型。
Inj Prev. 2022 Dec;28(6):564-569. doi: 10.1136/ip-2022-044619. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
The Intersectionality Toolbox: A Resource for Teaching and Applying an Intersectional Lens in Public Health.《交叉性工具箱:公共卫生教学与应用交叉视角的资源》
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;9:772301. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772301. eCollection 2021.
8
Rare exemplars and missed opportunities: Intersectionality within current sexual and gender diversity research and scholarship in psychology.罕见的范例和错失的机会:心理学中当前性与性别多样性研究与学术中的交叉性。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Feb;49:101511. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101511. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
9
Constituent-driven health policy informed by policy advocacy literature.由政策倡导文献提供信息的选民驱动型卫生政策。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 May 13;13(5):338-342. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac116.
10
Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies.定量健康差异研究中的交叉性:实证研究中挑战与局限的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113876. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113876. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging U = U in Interventions for Black Women Living With HIV: A Scoping Review and Call To Action.利用“U=U”对感染艾滋病毒的黑人女性进行干预:一项范围审查与行动呼吁
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jul;29(7):2077-2087. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04670-6. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Preconception Health Risk Factors and Access to Care.种族和社会经济差异对孕前健康风险因素和获得医疗服务的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Aug;33(8):1063-1071. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0560. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Racial and ethnic disparities in the co-occurrence of intellectual disability and autism: Impact of incorporating measures of adaptive functioning.智力残疾与自闭症共病的种族和民族差异:纳入适应功能衡量标准的影响。
Autism Res. 2024 Mar;17(3):650-667. doi: 10.1002/aur.3107. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Fetal Mortality: United States, 2019.胎儿死亡:美国,2019 年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Oct;70(11):1-20.
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breastfeeding Initiation ─ United States, 2019.2019 年美国母乳喂养初始率中的种族和民族差异。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 May 28;70(21):769-774. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7021a1.
3
Setting the Agenda for Reproductive and Maternal Health in the Era of COVID-19: Lessons from a Cruel and Radical Teacher.设定 COVID-19 时代生殖和孕产妇健康议程:来自残酷而激进老师的教训。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Feb;25(2):181-191. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03033-y. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Masks Are the New Condoms: Health Communication, Intersectionality and Racial Equity in COVID-Times.口罩成了新的避孕套:新冠疫情时期的健康传播、交叉性与种族平等
Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1740-1742. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1838095. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
The Disproportionate Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Pregnant Black Women.COVID-19 大流行给怀孕黑人女性带来的不成比例的负担。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113475. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113475. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Deaths - United States, 2007-2016.妊娠相关死亡的种族/民族差异 - 美国,2007-2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Sep 6;68(35):762-765. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6835a3.
7
Racial Disparities in Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration Among U.S. Infants Born in 2015.2015 年美国出生婴儿母乳喂养起始率和持续时间的种族差异。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 30;68(34):745-748. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6834a3.
8
Think, Ask, Act: The Intersectionality of Mental and Reproductive Health for Judicially Involved Girls.思考、提问、行动:司法涉案少女的心理健康和生殖健康的交叉问题。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;57(10):715-718. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.870.
9
"We black women have to kill a lion everyday": An intersectional analysis of racism and social determinants of health in Brazil.“我们黑人女性每天都要与狮子搏斗”:巴西种族主义和健康社会决定因素的交叉分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
Single mother families and employment, race, and poverty in changing economic times.经济变革时期的单亲家庭与就业、种族及贫困问题
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Feb;62:120-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 25.