• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的堕胎政策:新的法律格局及其对健康和社会经济福祉的威胁。

Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being.

机构信息

University of Michigan.

Ford School of Public Policy.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):283-301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12614. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12614
PMID:36960973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126955/
Abstract

Policy Points The historic 2022 Supreme Court Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision has created a new public policy landscape in the United States that will restrict access to legal and safe abortion for a significant proportion of the population. Policies restricting access to abortion bring with them significant threats and harms to health by delaying or denying essential evidence-based medical care and increasing the risks for adverse maternal and infant outcomes, including death. Restrictive abortion policies will increase the number of children born into and living in poverty, increase the number of families experiencing serious financial instability and hardship, increase racial inequities in socioeconomic security, and put significant additional pressure on under-resourced social welfare systems.

摘要

政策要点 2022 年具有历史意义的最高法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的裁决在美国创造了一个新的公共政策格局,这将限制相当一部分人口获得合法和安全的堕胎机会。限制堕胎机会的政策通过延迟或拒绝基本的循证医疗护理,并增加母婴不良后果(包括死亡)的风险,对健康构成重大威胁和危害。限制堕胎政策将增加贫困中出生和生活的儿童数量,增加遭遇严重财务不稳定和困难的家庭数量,增加社会经济安全方面的种族不平等,并使资源匮乏的社会福利系统承受巨大的额外压力。

相似文献

1
Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being.美国的堕胎政策:新的法律格局及其对健康和社会经济福祉的威胁。
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):283-301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12614. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Abortion Rights and the Child Welfare System: How Exacerbates Existing Racial Inequities and Further Traumatizes Black Families.堕胎权与儿童福利系统:如何加剧现有的种族不平等并进一步伤害黑人家庭。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(3):575-583. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.111. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Post- Abortion Restrictions and the Families They Leave Behind.堕胎后限制措施及其对家庭的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1043-1050. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792.
4
Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of .妇女羁押期间的堕胎机会
Am J Law Med. 2023 Dec;49(4):471-492. doi: 10.1017/amj.2024.4. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
State Abortion Policy and Moral Distress Among Clinicians Providing Abortion After the Dobbs Decision.多布斯案裁决后,各州堕胎政策与提供堕胎服务的临床医生的道德困扰
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426248. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26248.
6
Abortion Policy: Legal, Clinical, and Medical Education Considerations.堕胎政策:法律、临床和医学教育的考虑。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec 1;66(4):759-772. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000824. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
7
The impact of hostile abortion legislation on the United States maternal mortality crisis: a call for increased abortion education.敌对堕胎立法对美国产妇死亡率危机的影响:呼吁增加堕胎教育。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;11:1291668. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1291668. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.人类基因组计划对妇女权利和生殖决策的影响。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993 Apr;8(Suppl. 1):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000263882.
9
State Courts, State Legislatures, and Setting Abortion Policy.州法院、州立法机构与堕胎政策的制定
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Aug 1;48(4):569-592. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10449887.
10
Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案对医疗保健劳动力的影响。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2747-2750. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6. Epub 2024 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
English- and Spanish-speaking U.S. adults' perceptions of the most common reasons for abortion: a study of open-ended data before and after Dobbs v. Jackson.说英语和西班牙语的美国成年人对堕胎最常见原因的看法:一项关于多布斯诉杰克逊案前后开放式数据的研究。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jul 18;22(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02039-5.
2
"One's life becomes even more miserable when we hear all those hurtful words". A mixed methods systematic review of disrespect and abuse in abortion care.当我们听到所有那些伤人的话语时,一个人的生活会变得更加悲惨。关于堕胎护理中不尊重和虐待行为的混合方法系统评价。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 May 15;7:1561707. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1561707. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion provided using online telemedicine in the United States: A population based study.美国使用在线远程医疗进行自我管理药物流产的安全性和有效性:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jun;10. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100200. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
A Preview of the Dangerous Future of Abortion Bans - Texas Senate Bill 8.堕胎禁令的危险未来预览——德克萨斯州参议院法案8
N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 4;387(5):388-390. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2207423. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Navigating Loss of Abortion Services - A Large Academic Medical Center Prepares for the Overturn of .应对堕胎服务的缺失——一家大型学术医疗中心为(某项法案)的推翻做准备 。 (注:原文最后“of”后面内容缺失,翻译只能根据现有内容尽量完整表达)
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 2;386(22):2061-2064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2206246. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.《2019 年美国堕胎监测报告》。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Nov 26;70(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1.
5
Physician procedure volume and related adverse events after surgically induced abortion: a population-based cohort study.《基于人群的队列研究:与手术流产后相关的医师手术量及不良事件》
CMAJ. 2019 May 13;191(19):E519-E528. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181288. Epub 2019 May 12.
6
The Dynamics of Intimate Partner Violence and the Risk of Pregnancy during the Transition to Adulthood.成年过渡期亲密伴侣暴力的动态变化与怀孕风险
Am Sociol Rev. 2018 Oct;83(5):1020-1047. doi: 10.1177/0003122418795856. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Rape-Related Pregnancy and Association With Reproductive Coercion in the U.S.美国的与强奸相关的怀孕与生殖强迫的关联
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6):770-776. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Comparison of Health, Development, Maternal Bonding, and Poverty Among Children Born After Denial of Abortion vs After Pregnancies Subsequent to an Abortion.比较拒绝堕胎和堕胎后继续妊娠所生孩子的健康、发育、母婴关系和贫困情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;172(11):1053-1060. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785.
9
Early Exposure to Child Maltreatment and Academic Outcomes.儿童虐待的早期暴露与学业成绩。
Child Maltreat. 2018 Nov;23(4):365-375. doi: 10.1177/1077559518786815. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Motivations and Experiences of People Seeking Medication Abortion Online in the United States.在美国,寻求网上药物流产的人们的动机和体验。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Dec;50(4):157-163. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12073. Epub 2018 Jul 11.