Mureyi Dudzai, Katena Nyaradzai Arster, Monera-Penduka Tsitsi
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Primary Healthcare Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;2(3):e0000255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000255. eCollection 2022.
Nearly half of all sub-Saharan African countries lack operational Diabetes Mellitus policies. This represents an opportunity to build reliable evidence to underpin such policies when they are eventually developed. Representing the interests of those with the experience of living with the condition in national diabetes policies is important, particularly the interests regarding medicine access, a key pillar in diabetes management. One way to achieve this representation is to publish patient perceptions. Patient perspectives are especially valuable in the context of diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa, where much of the empirical work has focused on clinical and epidemiological questions. We therefore captured the challenges and suggestions around medicine access articulated by a population of diabetes patients and their caregivers. This was a qualitative interpretivist study based on data from focus group discussions with adult diabetes patients and their caregivers. Eight FGDs of 4-13 participants each whose duration averaged 13.35 minutes were conducted. Participants were recruited from diabetes outpatient clinics at two health facilities in Harare. One site was Parirenyatwa Hospital, the largest public referral and teaching hospital in Zimbabwe. The other was a private for-profit facility. Ethics approval was granted by the Joint Research Ethics Committee for University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences and the Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals (Ref: JREC 295/18). Diabetes patients and their caregivers are interested in affordable access to medicines of acceptable form and quality with minimum effort. Yet, they often find themselves privileging one dimension of access over another e.g. prioritising affordability over acceptability. Based on participants' articulations, a sound diabetes policy should: 1. provide for financial and consumer protections, 2. regulate healthcare business practices and medicine prices, 3. provide for a responsive health workforce attentive to patient problems, 4. accord the same importance to diabetes that is accorded to communicable diseases, 5. decentralize diabetes management to lower levels of care, 6. limit wastage, corruption, bad macro-financial governance and a lack of transparency about how funding for health is used, and 7. provide support to strengthen patients' and caregivers' psychosocial networks. A diabetes policy acceptable to patients is one infused with principles of good governance, fairness, inclusiveness and humanity; characterised by: financial protection and price regulation, consumer protection, equity in the attention accorded to different diseases, decentralized service delivery, inclusion of patient voice in political decision-making, a responsive compassionate health workforce, psychosocial support for patients and their caregivers and allocative efficiency and transparency in public expenditure.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区近一半的国家缺乏有效的糖尿病政策。这为在这些政策最终制定时建立可靠的证据以支持它们提供了一个契机。在国家糖尿病政策中体现糖尿病患者的利益很重要,特别是在药品获取方面,这是糖尿病管理的关键支柱。实现这种体现的一种方法是公布患者的看法。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的糖尿病背景下,患者的观点尤其有价值,因为那里的许多实证研究都集中在临床和流行病学问题上。因此,我们收集了糖尿病患者及其护理人员群体围绕药品获取所表达的挑战和建议。这是一项基于与成年糖尿病患者及其护理人员进行焦点小组讨论的数据的定性解释性研究。共进行了8次焦点小组讨论,每次有4至13名参与者,平均时长为13.35分钟。参与者是从哈拉雷两家医疗机构的糖尿病门诊招募的。一个地点是帕里伦亚瓦医院,它是津巴布韦最大的公立转诊和教学医院。另一个是一家营利性私立机构。该研究获得了津巴布韦大学健康科学学院和帕里伦亚瓦医院集团联合研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(参考编号:JREC 295/18)。糖尿病患者及其护理人员希望能以最小的努力以可接受的形式和质量获得价格合理的药品。然而,他们常常发现自己会在获取药品的某一方面优先于另一方面,例如将可承受性置于可接受性之上。基于参与者的阐述,一项完善的糖尿病政策应:1. 提供财务和消费者保护;2. 规范医疗商业行为和药品价格;3. 提供一支能响应患者问题的医疗队伍;4. 给予糖尿病与传染病同等的重视;5. 将糖尿病管理下放到更低层级的医疗服务;6. 减少浪费、腐败、糟糕的宏观金融管理以及卫生资金使用缺乏透明度的情况;7. 提供支持以加强患者及其护理人员的社会心理网络。一项患者可接受的糖尿病政策应融入善治、公平、包容和人道原则;其特点包括:财务保护和价格监管、消费者保护、对不同疾病给予平等关注、分散式服务提供、患者声音纳入政治决策、一支能响应且富有同情心的医疗队伍、对患者及其护理人员的社会心理支持以及公共支出的分配效率和透明度。