Peng Haobin, Wen Jiajun, Chen Manli, Xia Zhengyuan, Jiang Ying, Xie Kaiqi, Huang Weitao, Cui Bangsheng, Li Peixing, Zhang Yiwen, Wu Xianping
Department of Anesthesiology, Shunde Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528300, Guangdong, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pain Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00683-6. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
Single-injection pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with ropivacaine provides clear analgesic effects in preoperative pain management for hip fractures. However, it suffers from insufficient duration, failing to meet the needs of most patients. This single-center, randomized controlled, observer-blinded trial utilizes a novel combination of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) single-injection PENG block to examine its efficacy, duration, and safety in preoperative analgesia for hip fractures, aiming to develop a new preoperative analgesic protocol.
Sixty-six patients with hip fractures received ultrasound-guided single-injection PENG block with LB or ropivacaine after admission. The primary outcome was the static and dynamic pain scores measured at 48 h post-block. Pain scores at 12, 24, 36, 60, and 72 h post-block, rescue analgesia rate, time to first opioid, additional morphine consumption, and adverse events were assessed as the secondary outcomes.
LB versus ropivacaine group at 48 h post-block, with a median interquartile range (IQR) of 2 (1.0-2.0) versus 3 (2.0-3.0) at static pain score and 2 (1.75-3.0) versus 4 (4.0-5.0) at dynamic pain score. LB group had lower dynamic and static pain scores at other observation points except for the static pain score at 72 h, lower pain intensity [sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) SPID and SPID], longer time to first opioid, lower additional morphine consumption, and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. No significant inter-group differences were detected in other secondary outcomes.
For preoperative analgesia of hip fractures, LB single-injection PENG block had a similar analgesic intensity and safety as ropivacaine but provided a longer duration of analgesia, reaching 48 h and even extending beyond 60 h, which reduced opioid consumption and extended time to the first opioid.
The protocol was registered in www.chictr.org.cn under the identifier ChiCTR2300072939.
罗哌卡因单次注射关节周围神经群(PENG)阻滞在髋部骨折术前疼痛管理中具有明确的镇痛效果。然而,其作用持续时间不足,无法满足大多数患者的需求。这项单中心、随机对照、观察者盲法试验采用脂质体布比卡因(LB)单次注射PENG阻滞的新组合,以研究其在髋部骨折术前镇痛中的疗效、持续时间和安全性,旨在制定一种新的术前镇痛方案。
66例髋部骨折患者入院后接受超声引导下LB或罗哌卡因单次注射PENG阻滞。主要结局是阻滞48小时时测量的静态和动态疼痛评分。将阻滞12、24、36、60和72小时时的疼痛评分、补救镇痛率、首次使用阿片类药物的时间、额外吗啡消耗量和不良事件作为次要结局进行评估。
阻滞48小时时,LB组与罗哌卡因组相比,静态疼痛评分的中位数四分位间距(IQR)为2(1.0 - 2.0)对3(2.0 - 3.0),动态疼痛评分为2(1.75 - 3.0)对4(4.0 - 5.0)。除72小时时的静态疼痛评分外,LB组在其他观察点的动态和静态疼痛评分较低,疼痛强度[疼痛强度差值总和(SPID)]较低,首次使用阿片类药物的时间较长,额外吗啡消耗量较低,恶心和呕吐发生率较低。在其他次要结局中未检测到显著的组间差异。
对于髋部骨折的术前镇痛,LB单次注射PENG阻滞与罗哌卡因具有相似的镇痛强度和安全性,但镇痛持续时间更长,可达48小时甚至超过60小时,这减少了阿片类药物的消耗量,并延长了首次使用阿片类药物的时间。