Shushan Tzlil, Lovell Ric, Buchheit Martin, Scott Tannath J, Barrett Steve, Norris Dean, McLaren Shaun J
School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Sports Med Open. 2023 Mar 24;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00564-w.
Submaximal fitness tests (SMFT) are a pragmatic approach for evaluating athlete's physiological state, due to their time-efficient nature, low physiological burden and relative ease of administration in team sports settings. While a variety of outcome measures can be collected during SMFT, exercise heart rate (HRex) is the most popular. Understanding the measurement properties of HRex can support the interpretation of data and assist in decision making regarding athlete's current physiological state and training effects.
The aims of our systematic review and meta-analysis were to: (1) establish meta-analytic estimates of SMFT HRex reliability and convergent validity and (2) examine the moderating influence of athlete and protocol characteristics on the magnitude of these measurement properties.
We conducted a systematic literature search with MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases for studies published up until January 2022 since records began. Studies were considered for inclusion when they included team sports athletes and the reliability and/or convergent validity of SMFT HRex was investigated. Reliability statistics included the group mean difference (MD), typical error of measurement (TE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) derived from test-retest(s) designs. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) describing the relationship between SMFT HRex and a criterion measure of endurance performance was used as the statistic for convergent validity. Qualitative assessment was conducted using risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomised studies. Mixed-effects, multilevel hierarchical models combined with robust variance estimate tests were performed to obtain pooled measurement property estimates, effect heterogeneity, and meta-regression of modifying effects.
The electronic search yielded 21 reliability (29 samples) and 20 convergent validity (29 samples) studies that met the inclusion criteria. Reliability meta-analysis indicated good absolute (MD = 0.5 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9] and TE = 1.6 [95% CI 1.4 to 1.9] % points), and high relative (ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.84 to 0.91]) reliability. Convergent validity meta-analysis indicated an inverse, large relationship (r = - 0.58 [95% CI - 0.62 to - 0.54]) between SMFT HRex and endurance tests performance. Meta-regression analyses suggested no meaningful influence of SMFT protocol or athlete characteristics on reliability or convergent validity estimates.
Submaximal fitness test HRex is a reliable and valid proxy indicator of endurance performance in team sport athletes. Athlete and SMFT protocol characteristics do not appear to have a meaningful effect on these measurement properties. Practitioners may implement SMFT HRex for monitoring athlete's physiological state by using our applied implications to guide the interpretation of data in practice. Future research should examine the utility of SMFT HRex to track within-athlete changes in aerobic capacity, as well as any further possible effects of SMFT protocols design elements or HRex analytical methods on measurement properties. Registration Protocol registration can be found in Open Science Framework and available through https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9C2JV .
亚极量体能测试(SMFT)是评估运动员生理状态的一种实用方法,因为其具有省时、生理负担低以及在团队运动环境中相对易于实施的特点。虽然在亚极量体能测试期间可以收集多种结果指标,但运动心率(HRex)是最常用的。了解运动心率的测量特性有助于数据解读,并协助就运动员当前的生理状态和训练效果做出决策。
我们进行系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是:(1)建立亚极量体能测试运动心率可靠性和收敛效度的荟萃分析估计值;(2)检验运动员和测试方案特征对这些测量特性大小的调节作用。
我们使用MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science数据库对自记录开始至2022年1月发表的研究进行了系统文献检索。当研究纳入团队运动运动员且调查了亚极量体能测试运动心率的可靠性和/或收敛效度时,将其纳入考虑。可靠性统计包括组均值差异(MD)、测量的典型误差(TE)和重测设计得出的组内相关系数(ICC)。描述亚极量体能测试运动心率与耐力表现标准测量之间关系的Pearson相关系数(r)用作收敛效度的统计量。使用非随机研究的偏倚风险评估工具进行定性评估。进行混合效应、多层次分层模型结合稳健方差估计检验,以获得合并的测量特性估计值、效应异质性和调节效应的荟萃回归。
电子检索产生了21项可靠性研究(29个样本)和20项收敛效度研究(29个样本),这些研究符合纳入标准。可靠性荟萃分析表明具有良好的绝对可靠性(MD = 0.5 [95%CI 0.1至0.9],TE = 1.6 [95%CI 1.4至1.9]个百分点)和较高的相对可靠性(ICC = 0.88 [95%CI 0.84至0.91])。收敛效度荟萃分析表明,亚极量体能测试运动心率与耐力测试表现之间呈反向的强相关关系(r = -0.58 [95%CI -0.62至-0.54])。荟萃回归分析表明,亚极量体能测试方案或运动员特征对可靠性或收敛效度估计值没有有意义的影响。
亚极量体能测试运动心率是团队运动运动员耐力表现的可靠且有效的替代指标。运动员和亚极量体能测试方案特征似乎对这些测量特性没有有意义的影响。从业者可以通过应用我们的实际意义来指导实践中的数据解读,从而使用亚极量体能测试运动心率来监测运动员的生理状态。未来的研究应检验亚极量体能测试运动心率在跟踪运动员有氧能力变化方面的效用,以及亚极量体能测试方案设计要素或运动心率分析方法对测量特性的任何进一步可能影响。注册协议注册可在开放科学框架中找到,网址为https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9C2JV 。