Seidensticker Max, Öcal Osman, Schütte Kerstin, Malfertheiner Peter, Berg Thomas, Loewe Christian, Klümpen Heinz Josef, van Delden Otto, Ümütlü Muzaffer Reha, Ben Khaled Najib, de Toni Enrico Narciso, Seidensticker Ricarda, Aghdassi Ali, Tran Albert, Bronowicki Jean-Pierre, Peynircioglu Bora, Sangro Bruno, Pech Maciej, Ricke Jens
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany.
JHEP Rep. 2023 Feb 15;5(5):100699. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100699. eCollection 2023 May.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sorafenib treatment compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent local ablation.
The SORAMIC trial is a randomised controlled trial with diagnostic, local ablation, and palliative sub-study arms. After initial imaging within the diagnostic study, patients were assigned to local ablation or palliative arms. In the local ablation cohort, patients were randomised 1:1 to local ablation + sorafenib local ablation + placebo. The primary endpoint was time-to-recurrence (TTR). Secondary endpoints were local control rate and safety in terms of adverse events and quality-of-life.
The recruitment was terminated prematurely after 104 patients owing to slow recruitment. One patient was excluded because of a technical failure. Fifty-four patients were randomised to local ablation + sorafenib and 49 to local ablation + placebo. Eighty-eight patients who underwent standardised follow-up imaging comprised the per-protocol population. The median TTR was 15.2 months in the sorafenib arm and 16.4 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 1.1; 95% CI 0.53-2.2; = 0.82). Out of 136 lesions ablated within the trial, there was no difference in local recurrence rate between sorafenib (6/69, 8.6%) and placebo groups (5/67, 5.9%; = 0.792).Overall (92.5% 71.4%, = 0.008) and drug-related (81.4% 55.1%, = 0.003) adverse events were more common in the sorafenib arm compared with the placebo arm. Dose reduction because of adverse events were common in the sorafenib arm (79.6% 30.6%, <0.001).
Adjuvant sorafenib did not improve in TTR or local control rate after local ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the limitations of an early terminated trial.
Local ablation is the standard of care treatment in patients with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma, along with surgical therapies. However, there is a risk of disease recurrence during follow-up. Sorafenib, an oral medication, is a routinely used treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This study found that sorafenib treatment after local ablation in people with early hepatocellular carcinoma did not significantly improve the disease-free period compared with placebo.
EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645.
本研究旨在评估索拉非尼辅助治疗对比安慰剂用于接受局部消融的肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性。
SORAMIC试验是一项随机对照试验,设有诊断、局部消融和姑息治疗子研究组。在诊断研究的初始影像学检查后,患者被分配至局部消融组或姑息治疗组。在局部消融队列中,患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受局部消融 + 索拉非尼或局部消融 + 安慰剂治疗。主要终点为复发时间(TTR)。次要终点为局部控制率以及不良事件和生活质量方面的安全性。
由于入组缓慢,在纳入104例患者后提前终止招募。1例患者因技术故障被排除。54例患者被随机分配至局部消融 + 索拉非尼组,49例被分配至局部消融 + 安慰剂组。88例接受标准化随访影像学检查的患者构成符合方案人群。索拉非尼组的中位TTR为15.2个月,安慰剂组为16.4个月(风险比1.1;95%置信区间0.53 - 2.2;P = 0.82)。在试验中消融的136个病灶中,索拉非尼组(6/69,8.6%)和安慰剂组(5/67,5.9%;P = 0.792)的局部复发率无差异。与安慰剂组相比,索拉非尼组的总体不良事件(92.5%对71.4%,P = 0.008)和药物相关不良事件(81.4%对55.1%,P = 0.003)更为常见。索拉非尼组因不良事件而减量的情况很常见(79.6%对30.6%,P <0.001)。
在早期终止试验的局限性内,索拉非尼辅助治疗未能改善肝细胞癌患者局部消融后的TTR或局部控制率。
局部消融是早期肝细胞癌患者以及手术治疗的标准治疗方法。然而,随访期间存在疾病复发风险。索拉非尼是一种口服药物,常用于晚期肝细胞癌患者的治疗。本研究发现,早期肝细胞癌患者局部消融后使用索拉非尼治疗与安慰剂相比,并未显著改善无病生存期。
EudraCT 2009 - 012576 - 27,NCT01126645。