• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫情期间实施社会干预措施时沟通与背景的局限性及影响:重新审视加纳的免费供水政策

The limits and impact of communication and context in implementing social interventions in a pandemic: Ghana's free water policy revisited.

作者信息

Abubakari Maliha, Agyemang Fred Yeboah, Tei Felix

机构信息

University of Education Winneba, P. O. Box 25, Winneba, Ghana.

出版信息

Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2023;7(1):100483. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100483. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100483
PMID:36969730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10026179/
Abstract

The study examined the implementation of the free water intervention initiated by the government of Ghana during the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic. The study deployed a case study design within the qualitative research method. A total of 22 respondents were interviewed for the study. Findings from the study revealed that the implementation suffered some challenges which mostly stemmed from both the suddenness of the intervention and the complex context of the water sector in Ghana. The abruptness of the intervention resulted in poor communication and little or no consultation between the presidency and the implementer. The other major setback was the withdrawal of services by many tanker drivers from the supply of free water to designated Covid-19 reservoirs due to delays in reimbursement by the government. Furthermore, there was no effective monitoring mechanism to ensure complete adherence to the policy directive by both household vendors and landlords. Generally, the objective of the intervention to provide free water to all was largely ineffective due to the challenges highlighted above.

摘要

该研究考察了加纳政府在新冠疫情高峰期启动的免费供水干预措施的实施情况。该研究在定性研究方法中采用了案例研究设计。总共22名受访者接受了该研究的访谈。研究结果显示,实施过程面临一些挑战,这些挑战主要源于干预措施的突然性以及加纳水务部门复杂的环境。干预措施的突然性导致总统办公室与实施者之间沟通不畅,几乎没有或根本没有进行协商。另一个主要挫折是,由于政府报销延迟,许多油罐车司机停止了向指定的新冠疫情水库供应免费水的服务。此外,没有有效的监测机制来确保家庭供应商和房东完全遵守政策指令。总体而言,由于上述挑战,向所有人提供免费水这一干预措施的目标在很大程度上没有达到预期效果。

相似文献

1
The limits and impact of communication and context in implementing social interventions in a pandemic: Ghana's free water policy revisited.疫情期间实施社会干预措施时沟通与背景的局限性及影响:重新审视加纳的免费供水政策
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2023;7(1):100483. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100483. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
Stakeholders Perspectives on the Success Drivers in Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme - Identifying Policy Translation Issues.利益相关者视角下的加纳国家健康保险计划成功驱动因素——识别政策转化问题。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):273-283. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.133.
3
"I was on the way to the hospital but delivered in the bush": Maternal health in Ghana's Upper West Region in the context of a traditional birth attendants' ban.“我本来在去医院的路上,但却在丛林中分娩了”:在传统助产妇禁令背景下加纳上西部地区的孕产妇健康。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jan;148:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
4
Responses to donor proliferation in Ghana's health sector: a qualitative case study.加纳卫生部门对捐赠者扩散的应对措施:一项定性案例研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jan 1;93(1):11-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.141614. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
Ghana's rice value chain resilience in the context of COVID-19.新冠疫情背景下加纳大米价值链的韧性
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100210. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100210. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Improving Ghana's mental healthcare through task-shifting- psychiatrists and health policy directors perceptions about government's commitment and the role of community mental health workers.通过任务转移改善加纳的精神卫生保健——精神科医生和卫生政策主任对政府承诺及社区精神卫生工作者作用的看法
Global Health. 2016 Oct 1;12(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0199-z.
7
Achieving Sustainability and Scale-Up of Mobile Health Noncommunicable Disease Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Views of Policy Makers in Ghana.实现撒哈拉以南非洲移动医疗非传染性疾病干预措施的可持续性和扩大规模:加纳政策制定者的观点。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 3;7(5):e11497. doi: 10.2196/11497.
8
The short-term effect of the government of Ghana's decision to open borders at the early-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.加纳政府在新冠疫情初期决定开放边境的短期影响。
Sci Afr. 2022 Jul;16:e01250. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01250. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
9
Does the design and implementation of proven innovations for delivering basic primary health care services in rural communities fit the urban setting: the case of Ghana's Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS).在城市环境中,为农村社区提供基本初级卫生保健服务的经过验证的创新设计和实施是否适用:以加纳的基于社区的卫生规划和服务(CHPS)为例。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Apr 1;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-16.
10
Is value-based payment for healthcare feasible under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme?基于价值的医疗保健支付在加纳国家健康保险计划下是否可行?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00794-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond handwashing: Water insecurity undermines COVID-19 response in developing areas.洗手之外:水资源不安全削弱了发展中地区对新冠疫情的应对。
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010355. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010355.
2
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.