Pendeliuk Viktoria S, Melnick Igor V
Hospital of Urgent Medical Care, Department of Surgery No. 4, NAMS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine.
Department of Biophysics of Ion Channels, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, NAS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2023 Mar 9;17:1129991. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1129991. eCollection 2023.
Hippocampal interneurons (INs) are known to synchronize their electrical activity mechanisms, which are poorly defined due to immense complexity of neural tissue but seem to depend on local cell interactions and intensity of network activity.
Here, synchronization of INs was studied using paired patch-clamp recordings in a simplified culture model with intact glutamate transmission. The level of network activity was moderately elevated by field electric stimulation, which is probably an analogue of afferent processing .
Even in baseline conditions, ∼45% of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) resulting from firing of individual presynaptic INs coincided between cells within ±1 ms due to simple divergence of inhibitory axons. Brief network activation induced an appearance of 'hypersynchronous' (∼80%) population sIPSCs occurring in response to coherent discharges of several INs with jitter ±4 ms. Notably, population sIPSCs were preceded by transient inward currents (TICs). Those were excitatory events capable to synchronize firing of INs, in this respect being reminiscent of so-called fast prepotentials observed in studies on pyramidal neurons. TICs also had network properties consisting of heterogeneous components: glutamate currents, local axonal and dendritic spikelets, and coupling electrotonic currents likely gap junctions; putative excitatory action of synaptic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was not involved. The appearance of population excitatory-inhibitory sequences could be initiated and reproduced by firing of a single excitatory cell reciprocally connected with one IN.
Our data demonstrate that synchronization of INs is initiated and dominated by glutamatergic mechanisms, which recruit, in a whole-sale manner, into supporting action other excitatory means existing in a given neural system.
已知海马中间神经元(INs)会同步其电活动机制,由于神经组织极其复杂,这些机制目前尚不清楚,但似乎依赖于局部细胞相互作用和网络活动强度。
在此,我们在具有完整谷氨酸传递的简化培养模型中,使用配对膜片钳记录来研究INs的同步性。通过场电刺激适度提高网络活动水平,这可能类似于传入处理。
即使在基线条件下,由于抑制性轴突的简单发散,单个突触前INs放电产生的约45%的自发抑制性突触后电流(sIPSCs)在细胞间的时间差在±1毫秒内重合。短暂的网络激活诱导出现了“超同步”(约80%)的群体sIPSCs,这是由几个INs的相干放电引起的,抖动范围为±4毫秒。值得注意的是,群体sIPSCs之前有短暂内向电流(TICs)。这些是能够使INs放电同步的兴奋性事件,在这方面让人想起在对锥体神经元的研究中观察到的所谓快速预电位。TICs也具有由异质成分组成的网络特性:谷氨酸电流、局部轴突和树突小棘以及可能是缝隙连接的耦合电紧张电流;推测的突触γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的兴奋性作用未涉及。单个兴奋性细胞与一个IN相互连接并放电可启动和重现群体兴奋性-抑制性序列的出现。
我们的数据表明,INs的同步由谷氨酸能机制启动并主导,这些机制以整体方式招募给定神经系统中存在的其他兴奋性手段来支持其作用。