Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023 Spring;34(1):2-10. doi: 10.5080/u25864.
The aim of this study is to analyze the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS), which is used to measure the severity of Trichotillomania (TTM).
Fifty patients diagnosed with TTM according to the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and fifty healthy controls participated in the study. The participants were asked to complete a sociodemographic questionnaire, the MGH-HPS-TR, the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). The construct validity and the criterion validity of the MGH-HPS-TR were determined by means of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. The reliability analysis of the MGH-HPS-TR was assessed by calculating the Cronbach's α coefficient and the item total correlation coefficient. The values for the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were based on the ROC analysis.
AFA and CFA results indicated a single factor structure with 7 items explaining 82.5% of the variance. The item/factor loadings were satisfactory with the best fit indeces. Correlations were found between the scores on the MGH-HPS-TR and the other scales used for criterion validity analyses. The internal consistency and the item-total correlation coefficients of the scale were found to be satisfactory. Based on a cut of point of ≥ 9, the scale had high power for discriminating between the patient and the control groups and high sensitivity and specificity.
This study showed that the MGH-HPS-TR can be used as a valid and reliable psychometric tool in Turkey.
本研究旨在分析用于衡量拔毛癖(TTM)严重程度的 Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale(MGH-HPS)土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
根据 DSM-5 诊断标准诊断为 TTM 的 50 名患者和 50 名健康对照者参与了这项研究。要求参与者完成一份社会人口学问卷、MGH-HPS-TR、临床总体印象量表(CGI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和巴瑞特冲动量表(BIS-11)。通过探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)分别确定 MGH-HPS-TR 的结构效度和效标效度。通过计算克朗巴赫 α 系数和项目总分相关性系数来评估 MGH-HPS-TR 的可靠性分析。基于 ROC 分析,计算曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性的值。
EFA 和 CFA 结果表明,7 个项目的单因素结构解释了 82.5%的方差。项目/因子负荷与最佳拟合指标相符。MGH-HPS-TR 得分与用于准则有效性分析的其他量表之间存在相关性。该量表的内部一致性和项目总分相关性系数令人满意。基于≥9 的切点,该量表在区分患者组和对照组方面具有高判别力,且具有高敏感性和特异性。
本研究表明,MGH-HPS-TR 可作为土耳其语版有效的、可靠的心理计量工具。