• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进食障碍-15 量表:土耳其语临床和非临床样本版本的因子结构、心理测量学特性、效度和信度。

Eating Disorder-15: Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version for Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples.

出版信息

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023 Spring;34(1):31-38. doi: 10.5080/u27103.

DOI:10.5080/u27103
PMID:36970960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10552163/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) is a self-report scale recommended for use to evaluate weekly progress and treatment results in eating disorders. This research aims to examine the factor structure, psychometric properties, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of ED-15 (ED-15-TR) for clinical and non-clinical samples.

METHOD

Translation-back translation method was used for language equivalence of ED-15-TR. The research was conducted with a total of 1049 volunteers, with two sample groups as non-clinical (n=978) and clinical (n=71). The participants completed an information form, ED-15-TR, Eating Disorder Examination Scale (EDE-Q), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Three hundred fifty-two participants from the non-clinical group and 18 from the clinical group completed ED-15-TR again within a week.

RESULTS

Factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure of ED-15- TR. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.911 (0.773, and 0.904 for the two subscales respectively), the intraclass correlation coefficient for testretest reliability was 0.943 in the clinical group (0.906, and 0.942 for the two subscales respectively); 0.777 (0.699, and 0.776 for the two subscales respectively) in the non-clinical group (for all p<0.001). The high level of a positive correlation between ED-15-TR and EDE-Q supported concurrent validity.

CONCLUSION

This research indicates that ED-15-TR is an acceptable, valid, and reliable self-report scale for Turkish society.

摘要

目的

饮食障碍-15 (ED-15)是一种自我报告量表,推荐用于评估饮食障碍的每周进展和治疗结果。本研究旨在检验 ED-15-TR(ED-15-TR)在临床和非临床样本中的因子结构、心理测量特性、有效性和可靠性。

方法

采用翻译-回译法对 ED-15-TR 进行语言等效性检验。该研究共纳入 1049 名志愿者,分为两个样本组:非临床组(n=978)和临床组(n=71)。参与者完成了一份信息表、ED-15-TR、饮食障碍检查量表(EDE-Q)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)。非临床组中有 352 名参与者和临床组中有 18 名参与者在一周内再次完成了 ED-15-TR。

结果

因子分析证实了 ED-15-TR 的两因素结构。Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.911(两个子量表分别为 0.773 和 0.904),临床组的重测信度的组内相关系数为 0.943(两个子量表分别为 0.906 和 0.942);非临床组为 0.777(两个子量表分别为 0.699 和 0.776)(所有 p<0.001)。ED-15-TR 与 EDE-Q 之间高度的正相关支持了同时效度。

结论

本研究表明 ED-15-TR 是一种可接受、有效和可靠的土耳其语自报量表。

相似文献

1
Eating Disorder-15: Factor Structure, Psychometric Properties, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version for Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples.进食障碍-15 量表:土耳其语临床和非临床样本版本的因子结构、心理测量学特性、效度和信度。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023 Spring;34(1):31-38. doi: 10.5080/u27103.
2
Psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire and psychopathology in Japanese patients with eating disorders.进食障碍检查问卷的心理测量特性及日本进食障碍患者的精神病理学。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Feb;54(2):203-211. doi: 10.1002/eat.23452. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
3
Validation of the Lithuanian version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 in a student sample.验证《饮食障碍检查问卷 6.0》立陶宛语版本在学生样本中的适用性。
Brain Behav. 2020 Mar;10(3):e01555. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1555. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Validation of eating disorders examination questionnaire in Mexican women.进食障碍问卷在墨西哥女性中的验证。
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Feb;51(2):146-154. doi: 10.1002/eat.22819. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the schema mode inventory for eating disorders: short form for adults with dysfunctional eating behaviors.评估意大利版饮食失调图式模式量表的信度和效度:用于有饮食障碍的成年人的简短形式。
Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Jun;25(3):553-565. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00644-5. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
6
Psychometric properties of the adapted Malay Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q 6.0) among university students in Malaysia.适应马来西亚大学生的马来版饮食失调问卷-6.0(EDE-Q 6.0)的心理测量学特性。
Eat Behav. 2021 Aug;42:101533. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101533. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
Factor structure and psychometric properties of a multicultural Spanish-language version of the Eating Disorder-15 in a nonclinical sample of Chilean women.智利女性非临床样本中多文化西班牙语版饮食失调症-15量表的因子结构和心理测量特性
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Apr;56(4):727-735. doi: 10.1002/eat.23860. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a large female sample of adults with and without eating disorders.在有和没有饮食障碍的成年女性大样本中,挪威版患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03013-0.
9
Validity of the Greek Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q-6.0) among Greek adolescents.希腊版饮食失调检查问卷6.0(EDE-Q-6.0)在希腊青少年中的效度。
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jul-Sep;26(3):204-16.
10
Eating disorder examination questionnaire: psychometric properties and norms for the Portuguese population.饮食失调检查表:葡萄牙人群的心理测量特性和常模。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014 Nov;22(6):448-53. doi: 10.1002/erv.2318. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15): Factor structure, psychometric properties, and clinical validation.进食障碍-15 项量表(ED-15):因子结构、心理测量学特性和临床验证。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2019 Nov;27(6):682-691. doi: 10.1002/erv.2694. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
2
Can Recovery From an Eating Disorder Be Measured? Toward a Standardized Questionnaire.饮食失调的康复情况可以被衡量吗?迈向标准化问卷。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02456. eCollection 2018.
3
Validity and reliability of the Eating Problem Checklist.饮食问题清单的有效性和可靠性。
Eat Disord. 2019 Jul-Aug;27(4):384-399. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2018.1528084. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Sudden gains in the outpatient treatment of anorexia nervosa: A process-outcome study.神经性厌食症门诊治疗中的突然改善:一项过程-结果研究。
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Oct;50(10):1162-1171. doi: 10.1002/eat.22773. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
5
Are sudden gains important in the treatment of eating disorders?突然改善在饮食失调症的治疗中重要吗?
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Jan;49(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/eat.22458. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
6
Development, psychometric properties and preliminary clinical validation of a brief, session-by-session measure of eating disorder cognitions and behaviors: The ED-15.进食障碍认知与行为的简短、逐会话评估工具的编制、心理测量学特性和初步临床验证:ED-15。
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Nov;48(7):1005-15. doi: 10.1002/eat.22430. Epub 2015 May 26.
7
The Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (Munich ED-Quest) DSM-5/ICD-10: validity, reliability, sensitivity to change and norms.慕尼黑饮食与喂养障碍问卷(慕尼黑ED-Quest)DSM-5/ICD-10:效度、信度、变化敏感性及常模。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 May;23(3):229-40. doi: 10.1002/erv.2348. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
8
Sudden gains during psychological treatments of anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis.焦虑和抑郁心理治疗中的突见收益:一项荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Feb;80(1):93-101. doi: 10.1037/a0026455. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
The Turkish version of the eating disorder examination questionnaire: reliability and validity in adolescents.《进食障碍检查问卷》土耳其文版在青少年中的信度和效度。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):509-11. doi: 10.1002/erv.1104. Epub 2011 Mar 13.
10
The Change in Eating Disorder Symptoms scale: scale development and psychometric properties.进食障碍症状改变量表:量表编制及心理测量学特性。
Eat Behav. 2010 Aug;11(3):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 11.