Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 15;207(8):978-995. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202302-0310ST.
Current American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards promote the use of race and ethnicity-specific reference equations for pulmonary function test (PFT) interpretation. There is rising concern that the use of race and ethnicity in PFT interpretation contributes to a false view of fixed differences between races and may mask the effects of differential exposures. This use of race and ethnicity may contribute to health disparities by norming differences in pulmonary function. In the United States and globally, race serves as a social construct that is based on appearance and reflects social values, structures, and practices. Classification of people into racial and ethnic groups differs geographically and temporally. These considerations challenge the notion that racial and ethnic categories have biological meaning and question the use of race in PFT interpretation. The ATS convened a diverse group of clinicians and investigators for a workshop in 2021 to evaluate the use of race and ethnicity in PFT interpretation. Review of evidence published since then that challenges current practice and continued discussion concluded with a recommendation to replace race and ethnicity-specific equations with race-neutral average reference equations, which must be accompanied with a broader re-evaluation of how PFTs are used to make clinical, employment, and insurance decisions. There was also a call to engage key stakeholders not represented in this workshop and a statement of caution regarding the uncertain effects and potential harms of this change. Other recommendations include continued research and education to understand the impact of the change, to improve the evidence for the use of PFTs in general, and to identify modifiable risk factors for reduced pulmonary function.
当前,美国胸科学会 (ATS) 标准提倡使用特定种族和族裔的参考公式来解读肺功能测试 (PFT)。人们越来越担心,在 PFT 解读中使用种族和族裔会造成对种族间固有差异的错误看法,并可能掩盖差异暴露的影响。这种对种族和族裔的使用可能会通过规范肺功能的差异,导致健康差距。在美国和全球范围内,种族是一种基于外貌的社会建构,反映了社会价值观、结构和实践。人们被划分为不同的种族和族裔群体,这种分类在地理和时间上存在差异。这些考虑因素挑战了种族和族裔类别具有生物学意义的观点,并质疑了在 PFT 解读中使用种族的合理性。ATS 于 2021 年召集了一组多元化的临床医生和研究人员参加研讨会,以评估在 PFT 解读中使用种族和族裔的情况。自那时以来,对挑战当前实践的证据进行了审查,并继续进行了讨论,最终建议用种族中立的平均参考公式替代特定种族和族裔的公式,同时必须更广泛地重新评估如何使用 PFT 来做出临床、就业和保险决策。还呼吁让没有参加本次研讨会的主要利益相关者参与进来,并对这种变化的不确定影响和潜在危害发出警告。其他建议包括继续进行研究和教育,以了解变化的影响,改善 PFT 一般用途的证据,并确定可改变的降低肺功能的风险因素。