Meisterhans Michel, Flury Andreas, Zindel Christoph, Zimmermann Stefan M, Vlachopoulos Lazaros, Snedeker Jess G, Fucentese Sandro F
Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Mar 27;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00597-w.
Intraoperative hinge fractures in distal femur osteotomies represent a risk factor for loss of alignment and non-union. Using finite element analysis, the goal of this study was to investigate the influence of different hinge widths and osteotomy corrections on hinge fractures in medial closed-wedge and lateral open-wedge distal femur osteotomies.
The hinge was located at the proximal margin of adductor tubercle for biplanar lateral open-wedge and at the upper border of the lateral femoral condyle for biplanar medial closed-wedge distal femur osteotomies, corresponding to optimal hinge positions described in literature. Different hinge widths (5, 7.5, 10 mm) were created and the osteotomy correction was opened/closed by 5, 7.5 and 10 mm. Tensile and compressive strain of the hinge was determined in a finite element analysis and compared to the ultimate strain of cortical bone to assess the hinge fracture risk.
Doubling the correction from 5 to 10 mm increased mean tensile and compressive strain by 50% for lateral open-wedge and 48% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. A hinge width of 10 mm versus 5 mm showed increased strain in the hinge region of 61% for lateral open-wedge and 32% for medial closed-wedge osteotomies. Medial closed-wedge recorded a higher fracture risk compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies due to a larger hinge cross-section area (60-67%) for all tested configurations. In case of a 5 mm hinge, medial closed-wedge recorded 71% higher strain in the hinge region compared to lateral open-wedge osteotomies.
Due to morphological features of the medial femoral condyle, finite element analysis suggests that lateral-open wedge osteotomies are the preferable option if larger corrections are intended, as a thicker hinge can remain without an increased hinge fracture risk.
股骨远端截骨术中的术中铰链骨折是导致对线丢失和不愈合的危险因素。本研究旨在通过有限元分析,探讨不同铰链宽度和截骨矫正量对股骨远端内侧闭合楔形截骨术和外侧开放楔形截骨术中铰链骨折的影响。
对于双平面外侧开放楔形截骨术,铰链位于内收肌结节的近端边缘;对于双平面内侧闭合楔形股骨远端截骨术,铰链位于股骨外侧髁的上缘,这与文献中描述的最佳铰链位置相对应。创建不同的铰链宽度(5、7.5、10毫米),并将截骨矫正量打开/闭合5、7.5和10毫米。在有限元分析中确定铰链的拉伸和压缩应变,并与皮质骨的极限应变进行比较,以评估铰链骨折风险。
将矫正量从5毫米增加到10毫米,外侧开放楔形截骨术的平均拉伸和压缩应变增加50%,内侧闭合楔形截骨术增加48%。铰链宽度为10毫米与5毫米相比,外侧开放楔形截骨术的铰链区域应变增加61%,内侧闭合楔形截骨术增加32%。由于所有测试构型的铰链横截面积较大(60-67%),内侧闭合楔形截骨术的骨折风险高于外侧开放楔形截骨术。在铰链宽度为5毫米的情况下,内侧闭合楔形截骨术的铰链区域应变比外侧开放楔形截骨术高71%。
由于股骨内侧髁形态特征,有限元分析表明,如果需要更大的矫正量,外侧开放楔形截骨术是更优选择,因为可以保留较厚的铰链而不增加铰链骨折风险。