Accuracy of Combined High Tibial Slope Correction Osteotomy Using 3-Dimensional-Planned Patient-Specific Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND

If an increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) and concomitant unicompartmental osteoarthritis are present, a simultaneous sagittal (slope) and coronal correcting high tibial osteotomy has been recommended. However, no study has investigated the accuracy of such combined high tibial slope correction osteotomies.

PURPOSE

(1) To report the accuracy of navigated high tibial slope correction osteotomies using patient-specific instruments (PSI) and (2) to analyze the influence of an open wedge osteotomy (OWO) versus a closed wedge osteotomy (CWO) and the hinge axis angle (HAA) on the accuracy of the PTS correction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All PSI PTS-reducing osteotomies performed at 1 institution between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. Three-dimensional (3D) accuracy was defined as the mean absolute 3D angular difference between the planned and achieved surgical correction (in degrees) in 3D models of computed tomography data. The influence of OWO versus CWO and the HAA on the reported accuracy was analyzed and a cutoff defined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients who underwent a slope-reducing CWO (n = 9) or OWO (n = 9) were included. The 3D accuracy for PTS was 2.3°± 1.1° (mean ± SD), with CWO being more accurate than OWO (1.4°± 0.9° vs 3.1°± 0.6°; < .01). Accuracy strongly correlated with the HAA ( = 0.788; < .01). An HAA >38.9° predicted a PTS error >2° (odds ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.20; = .004]; area under the curve, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89-1.00; < .001]) corresponding to a coronal/sagittal correction of 0.8:1.

CONCLUSION

Slope-reducing osteotomy can accurately be achieved using PSI. CWO demonstrated an increased accuracy when compared with OWO, which strongly depended on the HAA. With an aim of combined PTS and coronal correction, CWO should be considered the primary choice for accurate slope reduction with a coronal/sagittal correction cutoff of 0.8:1 (HAA, 38.9°).