Prpic Vladimir, Catic Amir, Kraljevic Simunkovic Sonja, Bergman Lana, Cimic Samir
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;11(3):66. doi: 10.3390/dj11030066.
The data about bond strength between digitally produced denture base resins and artificial teeth are scarce. Several studies investigated shear bond strength values of milled denture base resins and different types of artificial teeth. The purpose of the present study was to compare and evaluate the available evidence through a systematic review. A bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to assess adequate studies published up to 1 June 2022. This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The appropriate studies that determined the shear bond strength values between milled denture base resins and artificial teeth were selected. The initial search identified 103 studies, which were included in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, and all of them present a moderate risk of bias (score 6). Two studies found no statistical differences between heat-polymerized and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base materials when attached with different types of artificial teeth, while one study showed higher values of CAD/CAM (milled) denture base materials. Bonding agents ensure bonding strength at least similar to the conventional methods. In order to improve the quality of future studies, it would be advantageous to use a larger number of specimens with standardized dimensions and a blinded testing machine operator to decrease the risk of bias.
关于数字化制作的义齿基托树脂与人工牙之间粘结强度的数据很少。有几项研究调查了铣削义齿基托树脂与不同类型人工牙的剪切粘结强度值。本研究的目的是通过系统评价来比较和评估现有证据。在PubMed、Scopus和科学网进行了文献检索,以评估截至2022年6月1日发表的充分研究。本评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南。选择了确定铣削义齿基托树脂与人工牙之间剪切粘结强度值的合适研究。初步检索确定了103项研究,这些研究被纳入新系统评价的PRISMA 2020流程图。三项研究符合纳入标准,并且所有研究都存在中度偏倚风险(评分为6分)。两项研究发现,当与不同类型的人工牙连接时,热聚合义齿基托材料和CAD/CAM(铣削)义齿基托材料之间没有统计学差异,而一项研究显示CAD/CAM(铣削)义齿基托材料的值更高。粘结剂确保粘结强度至少与传统方法相似。为了提高未来研究的质量,使用大量尺寸标准化的标本和不知情的测试机操作员来降低偏倚风险将是有利的。