Zanza Christian, Romenskaya Tatsiana, Zuliani Marta, Piccolella Fabio, Bottinelli Maria, Caputo Giorgia, Rocca Eduardo, Maconi Antonio, Savioli Gabriele, Longhitano Yaroslava
Department of Integrated Research and Innovation Activities, Unit of Translational Medicine AON SS, Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo H, 15121 Alessandria, Italy.
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Diseases. 2023 Mar 3;11(1):45. doi: 10.3390/diseases11010045.
Trauma is a major cause of mortality throughout the world. Traumatic pain-acute, sudden, or chronic-is defined as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage". Patients' perceptions of pain assessment and management have become an important criterion and relevant outcome measure for healthcare institutions. Several studies show that 60-70% of ER patients experience pain, and more than half of them express a feeling of sorrow, which can be moderate or severe, at triage. The few studies that have analyzed how pain is assessed and managed in these departments agree that approximately 70% of patients receive no analgesia or receive it with remarkable delay. Specifically, less than half of the patients receive treatment for pain during admission and 60% of discharged patients have higher intensity pain than at admission. Trauma patients are also the ones who most commonly report low satisfaction with pain management. Associated with this lack of satisfaction, we can describe the poor use of tools for measuring and recording pain, poor communication among caregivers, inadequate training in pain assessment and management, and widespread misconceptions among nurses about the reliability of patients' estimation of pain. The aim of this article is to review the scientific literature to explore the methodologies of pain management in trauma patients attending the emergency room and analyzing their weaknesses as a starting point to improve the approach to this, unfortunately too often, underestimated issue. A literature search was performed using the major databases to identify relevant studies in indexed scientific journals. The literature showed that the multimodal approach in trauma patients is the best approach to pain management. It is becoming increasingly crucial to manage the patient on multiple fronts. Drugs acting on different pathways can be administered together at lower doses, minimizing risks. Every emergency department must have staff trained in the assessment and immediate management of pain symptoms as this allows the reduction of mortality and morbidity and shortens hospital stays, contributing to early mobilization, reduced hospital costs, and enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life.
创伤是全球范围内主要的死亡原因。创伤性疼痛——急性、突发性或慢性疼痛——被定义为“与实际或潜在组织损伤相关的不愉快的感官和情感体验”。患者对疼痛评估和管理的认知已成为医疗机构的一项重要标准和相关结果衡量指标。多项研究表明,60%至70%的急诊患者会经历疼痛,其中超过一半的患者在分诊时表达出中度或重度的悲伤情绪。少数分析这些科室如何评估和管理疼痛的研究一致认为,约70%的患者未接受镇痛治疗或接受治疗的时间显著延迟。具体而言,不到一半的患者在入院期间接受了疼痛治疗,60%的出院患者的疼痛强度高于入院时。创伤患者也是最常报告对疼痛管理满意度较低的人群。与此种满意度缺乏相关的是,我们可以看到用于测量和记录疼痛的工具使用不当、医护人员之间沟通不畅、疼痛评估和管理方面培训不足以及护士对患者疼痛估计的可靠性普遍存在误解。本文旨在回顾科学文献,探讨急诊创伤患者疼痛管理的方法,并分析其不足之处,以此为起点改进对这个不幸常常被低估的问题的处理方式。通过使用主要数据库进行文献检索,以识别索引科学期刊中的相关研究。文献表明,创伤患者的多模式方法是疼痛管理的最佳方法。从多个方面管理患者变得越来越关键。作用于不同途径的药物可以以较低剂量联合使用,将风险降至最低。每个急诊科都必须配备经过疼痛症状评估和即时管理培训的工作人员,因为这有助于降低死亡率和发病率,缩短住院时间,促进早期活动,降低医院成本,并提高患者满意度和生活质量。