• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索认知能力倾斜与工作绩效之间的关系。

Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Ability Tilt and Job Performance.

作者信息

Kato Anne E, Scherbaum Charles A

机构信息

School of Business, Government, and Economics, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA 98119, USA.

Department of Psychology, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY 10010, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Feb 23;11(3):44. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030044.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11030044
PMID:36976137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10057608/
Abstract

Most of the work examining the relationship between intelligence and job performance has conceptualized intelligence as . Recent findings, however, have supported the claim that more specific factors of intelligence contribute to the prediction of job performance. The present study builds upon prior work on specific cognitive abilities by investigating the relationship between ability tilt, a measure representing differential strength between two specific abilities, and job performance. It was hypothesized that ability tilt would differentially relate to job performance based on whether or not the tilt matched the ability requirements of the job, and that ability tilt would provide incremental validity over and specific abilities for predicting performance when the tilt matched job requirements. Hypotheses were tested using a large sample from the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) database. Ability tilt related with job performance in the expected direction for 27 of the 36 tilt-job combinations examined, with a mean effect size of .04 when the tilt matched job requirements. The mean incremental validities for ability tilt were .007 over and .003 over and specific abilities, and, on average, tilt explained 7.1% of the total variance in job performance. The results provide limited evidence that ability tilt may be a useful predictor in addition to ability level, and contribute to our understanding of the role of specific abilities in the workplace.

摘要

大多数研究智力与工作绩效之间关系的工作都将智力概念化为 。然而,最近的研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即智力的更具体因素有助于预测工作绩效。本研究在先前关于特定认知能力的工作基础上,通过调查能力倾斜(一种表示两种特定能力之间差异强度的指标)与工作绩效之间的关系来展开。研究假设,能力倾斜与工作绩效的关系会因倾斜是否与工作的能力要求相匹配而有所不同,并且当倾斜与工作要求匹配时,能力倾斜在预测绩效方面将比 和特定能力具有增量效度。使用来自一般能力倾向成套测验(GATB)数据库的大样本对假设进行了检验。在所考察的36种倾斜 - 工作组合中,有27种组合的能力倾斜与工作绩效呈预期方向相关,当倾斜与工作要求匹配时,平均效应大小为0.04。能力倾斜相对于 的平均增量效度为0.007,相对于 和特定能力的平均增量效度为0.003,平均而言,倾斜解释了工作绩效总方差的7.1%。结果提供了有限的证据表明,除了能力水平之外,能力倾斜可能是一个有用的预测指标,并有助于我们理解特定能力在工作场所中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480b/10057608/4dddf12aa97f/jintelligence-11-00044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480b/10057608/4dddf12aa97f/jintelligence-11-00044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/480b/10057608/4dddf12aa97f/jintelligence-11-00044-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Ability Tilt and Job Performance.探索认知能力倾斜与工作绩效之间的关系。
J Intell. 2023 Feb 23;11(3):44. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030044.
2
Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than ?工作场所中的特殊能力:比……更重要?
J Intell. 2017 Apr 12;5(2):13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5020013.
3
An examination of age and cognitive test performance across job complexity and occupational types.对不同工作复杂性和职业类型下的年龄与认知测试表现的考察。
J Appl Psychol. 1990 Feb;75(1):43-50. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.43.
4
General mental ability and specific abilities: Their relative importance for extrinsic career success.一般智力和特殊能力:对外部职业成功的相对重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Sep;105(9):1047-1061. doi: 10.1037/apl0000472. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Non- Factors Predict Educational and Occupational Criteria: More than .非因素预测教育和职业标准:超过…… (你提供的原文似乎不完整,翻译可能不太准确)
J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3):43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030043.
6
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
7
Explaining the Validity of the ASVAB for Job-Relevant Multitasking Performance: The Role of Placekeeping Ability.解释美国武装部队职业倾向测验(ASVAB)对与工作相关的多任务表现的有效性:占位能力的作用。
J Intell. 2023 Dec 15;11(12):225. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11120225.
8
Evaluating cognitive ability, knowledge tests and situational judgement tests for postgraduate selection.评估认知能力、知识测试和情景判断测试在研究生选拔中的应用。
Med Educ. 2012 Apr;46(4):399-408. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04195.x.
9
Incremental Validity of Character Strengths as Predictors of Job Performance Beyond General Mental Ability and the Big Five.性格优势作为工作绩效预测指标相对于一般智力和大五人格的增量效度。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 12;12:518369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.518369. eCollection 2021.
10
Age and job fit: The relationship between demands-ability fit and retirement and health.年龄与工作适配性:需求能力适配与退休和健康的关系。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;25(4):227-243. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000164. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Ability Testing in the Workplace: Modern Approaches and Methods.职场中的认知能力测试:现代方法与手段
J Intell. 2025 Jun 11;13(6):68. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060068.
2
The development and validation of a tablet-based assessment battery of general cognitive ability.基于平板电脑的一般认知能力评估组合的开发与验证
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 24;12(1):778. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02283-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.重新审视人员选拔中有效性的元分析估计:解决因范围限制而进行的系统过度校正问题。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Nov;107(11):2040-2068. doi: 10.1037/apl0000994. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
Aligning Predictor-Criterion Bandwidths: Specific Abilities as Predictors of Specific Performance.匹配预测指标与标准的带宽:特定能力作为特定表现的预测指标
J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3):40. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030040.
3
The Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes.
大辩论:一般能力与特殊能力对重要结果的预测作用
J Intell. 2018 Sep 7;6(3):39. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030039.
4
Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than ?工作场所中的特殊能力:比……更重要?
J Intell. 2017 Apr 12;5(2):13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5020013.
5
When Lightning Strikes Twice: Profoundly Gifted, Profoundly Accomplished.当闪电击中两次:天赋异禀,成就非凡。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;27(7):1004-18. doi: 10.1177/0956797616644735. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression.一种估计多元回归中预测变量相对权重的启发式方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2000 Jan 1;35(1):1-19. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1.
7
More than g: selection quality and adverse impact implications of considering second-stratum cognitive abilities.考虑第二层次认知能力的选择质量和不良影响含义。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):547-63. doi: 10.1037/a0035183. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Who rises to the top? Early indicators.谁能脱颖而出?早期指标。
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):648-59. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457784. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Exceptional cognitive ability: the phenotype.卓越的认知能力:表型
Behav Genet. 2009 Jul;39(4):350-8. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9273-0. Epub 2009 May 8.
10
Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity.拥有同等学位的人之间的能力差异对科学创造力很重要。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):957-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02182.x.