Department of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Av. Fuente Nueva s/n, Mecenas Building, 18003, Granada, Spain.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;261(8):2281-2289. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06020-5. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
To assess and compare the changes produced by the two most commonly used substances, alcohol and cannabis, on accommodation dynamics.
A total of 38 young participants (19 females) were enrolled in the study. They were assigned to two groups: a cannabis group (N = 19) and an alcohol group. Participants in the cannabis group underwent two randomized sessions: a baseline session and a session after smoking a cigarette. Participants in the alcohol group underwent three randomized sessions: a baseline session, a session after the intake of 300 ml of red wine (Alcohol 1), and other after the ingestion of 450 ml of wine (Alcohol 2). For the accommodation assessment, the open-field autorefractor WAM-5500 was used.
The decrease of the mean velocity of the accommodative response produced by Alcohol 2 condition was significantly greater than that observed for Alcohol 1 and Cannabis (p = 0.046). The direction of the accommodation (near-distance and distance-near) had no effect on the deterioration of the accommodation dynamics following substance use. The target distance had a significant effect on the decrease of the mean velocity following substance use (p = 0.002). The decrease of the amplitude of the accommodative response was associated with a decrease of the peak velocity (p = 0.004) and the increase of the accommodative lag (p < 0.001).
A moderate-high dose of alcohol impairs accommodation dynamics to a greater extent that lower dose of alcohol or smoked cannabis. The deterioration of the accommodation mean speed was higher for a shorter target distance.
评估和比较两种最常用物质(酒精和大麻)对调节动态的影响。
共纳入 38 名年轻参与者(19 名女性)。他们被分为两组:大麻组(N=19)和酒精组。大麻组的参与者进行了两次随机分组:基线组和吸烟后组。酒精组的参与者进行了三次随机分组:基线组、摄入 300ml 红酒(酒精 1)后组和摄入 450ml 红酒(酒精 2)后组。使用开放式自动折射仪 WAM-5500 评估调节功能。
酒精 2 条件下调节反应平均速度的下降明显大于酒精 1 和大麻组(p=0.046)。使用物质后调节动力学的恶化与调节(近距和远距)方向无关。目标距离对使用物质后平均速度的下降有显著影响(p=0.002)。调节反应幅度的下降与峰值速度的下降(p=0.004)和调节滞后的增加(p<0.001)相关。
中高剂量的酒精对调节动态的影响大于低剂量的酒精或吸食大麻。较短的目标距离会导致调节平均速度的恶化更明显。