Fonseca Melissa Gabriela Bravo, Hilário Heron Oliveira, Kotrschal Kurt, Range Friederike, Virányi Zsófia, Duarte Marina Henriques Lage, Pereira Laryssa Cristina Gomes, Vasconcellos Angélica da Silva
Program of Post-Graduation in Vertebrate Biology, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30535-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Laboratory of Conservation Genetics, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 30535-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1071. doi: 10.3390/ani13061071.
In a previous study, we found that Positive Reinforcement Training reduced cortisol of wolves and dogs; however, this effect varied across trainer-animal dyads. Here we investigate whether and how the trainers' use of speech may contribute to this effect. Dogs' great interest in high-pitched, intense speech (also known as Dog Directed Speech) has already been reported, but whether and how wolves respond similarly/differently to voice characteristics has never been studied before. We analyzed 270 training sessions, conducted by five trainers, with nine mixed-breed dogs and nine wolves, all human-socialized. Through Generalized Linear Mixed Models, we analyzed the effects of (a) three speech categories (nice, neutral, reprehensive) and laugh; and (b) acoustic characteristics of trainers' voices on animals' responses (correct responses, latency, orientation, time at less than 1 m, non-training behaviors, tail position/movements, cortisol variation). In both subspecies, tail wagging occurred more often in sessions with longer durations of nice speech, and less often in sessions with reprehensive speech. For dogs, the duration of reprehensive speech within a session was also negatively related to correct responses. For wolves, retreat time was associated with more reprehensive speech, whereas duration of nice speech was positively associated with time spent within one meter from the trainer. In addition, most dog behavioral responses were associated with higher average intonations within sessions, while wolf responses were correlated with lower intonations within sessions. We did not find any effects of the variables considered on cortisol variation. Our study highlights the relevance of voice tone and speech in a training context on animals' performances and emotional reactions.
在之前的一项研究中,我们发现正向强化训练降低了狼和狗的皮质醇水平;然而,这种效果在训练师与动物的配对中存在差异。在此,我们研究训练师的言语使用是否以及如何促成了这种效果。狗对高音调、强烈的言语(也称为对狗的言语)表现出极大兴趣,这一点已有报道,但狼是否以及如何对声音特征有类似/不同的反应此前从未被研究过。我们分析了由五位训练师对九只混种狗和九只狼进行的270次训练课程,所有动物都经过人类社会化训练。通过广义线性混合模型,我们分析了(a)三种言语类别(友好、中性、斥责)和笑声;以及(b)训练师声音的声学特征对动物反应(正确反应、潜伏期、定向、距离小于1米的时间、非训练行为、尾巴位置/动作、皮质醇变化)的影响。在两个亚种中,尾巴摆动在友好言语持续时间较长的课程中更频繁出现,而在斥责言语的课程中较少出现。对于狗来说,课程中斥责言语的持续时间也与正确反应呈负相关。对于狼来说,退缩时间与更多的斥责言语相关,而友好言语的持续时间与在距离训练师一米范围内停留的时间呈正相关。此外,大多数狗的行为反应与课程中的较高平均语调相关,而狼的反应与课程中的较低语调相关。我们没有发现所考虑的变量对皮质醇变化有任何影响。我们的研究强调了训练情境中语调与言语对动物表现和情绪反应的重要性。