Medical Proteome Analysis, Center for Protein Diagnostics (ProDi), Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Biomolecules. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):491. doi: 10.3390/biom13030491.
Proteomic studies using mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantification are a main approach to the discovery of new biomarkers. However, a number of analytical conditions in front and during MS data acquisition can affect the accuracy of the obtained outcome. Therefore, comprehensive quality assessment of the acquired data plays a central role in quantitative proteomics, though, due to the immense complexity of MS data, it is often neglected. Here, we address practically the quality assessment of quantitative MS data, describing key steps for the evaluation, including the levels of raw data, identification and quantification. With this, four independent datasets from cerebrospinal fluid, an important biofluid for neurodegenerative disease biomarker studies, were assessed, demonstrating that sample processing-based differences are already reflected at all three levels but with varying impacts on the quality of the quantitative data. Specifically, we provide guidance to critically interpret the quality of MS data for quantitative proteomics. Moreover, we provide the free and open source quality control tool , enabling systematic, rapid and uncomplicated data comparison of raw data, identification and feature detection levels through defined quality metrics and a step-by-step quality control workflow.
基于质谱(MS)定量的蛋白质组学研究是发现新生物标志物的主要方法。然而,MS 数据采集前后的许多分析条件会影响获得结果的准确性。因此,尽管由于 MS 数据的复杂性,综合评估获得的数据在定量蛋白质组学中起着核心作用,但通常会被忽视。在这里,我们实际上解决了定量 MS 数据的质量评估问题,描述了评估的关键步骤,包括原始数据、鉴定和定量的水平。使用该方法,评估了来自脑脊液的四个独立数据集,脑脊液是神经退行性疾病生物标志物研究的重要生物流体,结果表明基于样本处理的差异已经在所有三个水平上反映出来,但对定量数据的质量有不同的影响。具体来说,我们为定量蛋白质组学提供了批判性解释 MS 数据质量的指导。此外,我们还提供了免费和开源的质量控制工具 ,通过定义的质量指标和逐步的质量控制工作流程,能够对原始数据、鉴定和特征检测水平进行系统、快速和简单的数据比较。