Fernandes Carla, Martins Fátima, Santos Ana F, Fernandes Marília, Veríssimo Manuela
William James Center Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal.
ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal.
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;10(3):464. doi: 10.3390/children10030464.
Learning to eat complementary foods is a crucial milestone for infants, having implications across development. The most used method for introducing complementary foods is Traditional Spoon-Feeding (TSF). However, the alternative method Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) is increasingly becoming used as it has been associated with positive outcomes. Research analyzing associations between complementary feeding methods and responsive parenting is practically non-existent. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze differences in emotional and feeding responsiveness between caregivers who previously implemented traditional vs. non-traditional feeding approaches. Caregivers (mostly mothers) of 179 children between 3 and 5 years were asked about the complementary feeding method that they had followed previously (70.4% reported using the TSF, 16.8% said they used the BLW and 12.8% used both methods simultaneously). In addition, they reported on their feeding practices using the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire and on their responses to children's distress using the Coping with Children's Negative Emotions Scale. The results showed that parents who reported using a non-traditional (BLW or both) complementary feeding method reported less pressure to eat and minimization of reactions to children's negative emotions, compared to parents who used a traditional method (although these reported using more problem-focused reactions). The findings suggest that complementary feeding methods and responsive parenting may be linked, leaving the question of which one sets the stage for the other.
学习食用辅食是婴儿成长过程中的一个关键里程碑,对其全面发展具有重要意义。引入辅食最常用的方法是传统勺喂法(TSF)。然而,另一种方法——婴儿主导式断奶法(BLW)正越来越多地被采用,因为它与积极的结果相关联。实际上,几乎不存在分析辅食喂养方法与积极育儿方式之间关联的研究。因此,本研究的目的是分析之前采用传统喂养方式与非传统喂养方式的照料者在情感反应和喂养反应方面的差异。研究询问了179名3至5岁儿童的照料者(大多数为母亲)之前所采用的辅食喂养方法(70.4%报告使用传统勺喂法,16.8%表示使用婴儿主导式断奶法,12.8%同时使用两种方法)。此外,他们通过综合喂养行为问卷报告了自己的喂养行为,并通过应对儿童负面情绪量表报告了对孩子苦恼的反应。结果显示,与采用传统喂养方法的父母相比,报告使用非传统(婴儿主导式断奶法或两种方法都用)辅食喂养方法的父母表示在喂食方面施加的压力较小,对孩子负面情绪的反应也较少(尽管这些父母报告使用更多以问题为导向的反应)。研究结果表明,辅食喂养方法与积极育儿方式可能存在关联,这就留下了究竟是哪种方式为另一种方式奠定基础的问题。