• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用两样本孟德尔随机化探究儿童对幸福感的终生影响。

Exploring the Lifetime Effect of Children on Wellbeing Using Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation.

机构信息

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;14(3):716. doi: 10.3390/genes14030716.

DOI:10.3390/genes14030716
PMID:36980988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10048211/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational research implies a negative effect of having children on wellbeing.

OBJECTIVES

To provide Mendelian randomisation evidence of the effect of having children on parental wellbeing.

DESIGN

Two-sample Mendelian randomisation.

SETTING

Non-clinical European ancestry participants.

PARTICIPANTS

We used the UK Biobank (460,654 male and female European ancestry participants) as a source of genotype-exposure associations, the Social Science Genetics Consortia (SSGAC) (298,420 male and female European ancestry participants), and the Within-Family Consortia (effective sample of 22,656 male and female European ancestry participants) as sources of genotype-outcome associations.

INTERVENTIONS

The lifetime effect of an increase in the genetic liability to having children.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary analysis was an inverse variance weighed analysis of subjective wellbeing measured in the 2016 SSGAC Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS). Secondary outcomes included pleiotropy robust estimators applied in the SSGAC and an analysis using the Within-Family consortia GWAS.

RESULTS

We did not find strong evidence of a negative (standard deviation) change in wellbeing (β = 0.153 (95% CI: -0.210 to 0.516) per child parented. Secondary outcomes were generally slightly deflated (e.g., -0.049 [95% CI: -0.533 to 0.435] for the Within-Family Consortia and 0.090 [95% CI: -0.167 to 0.347] for weighted median), implying the presence of some residual confounding and pleiotropy.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to the existing literature, our results are not compatible with a measurable negative effect of number of children on the average wellbeing of a parent over their life course. However, we were unable to explore non-linearities, interactions, or time-varying effects.

摘要

背景

观察性研究表明生育子女对幸福感有负面影响。

目的

提供孟德尔随机化证据,证明生育子女对父母幸福感的影响。

设计

两样本孟德尔随机化。

设置

非临床欧洲血统参与者。

参与者

我们使用英国生物银行(460654 名男性和女性欧洲血统参与者)作为基因型-暴露关联的来源,社会科学遗传学联盟(SSGAC)(298420 名男性和女性欧洲血统参与者),以及家庭内联盟(22656 名男性和女性欧洲血统有效样本参与者)作为基因型-结果关联的来源。

干预措施

遗传易感性增加生育子女的终生影响。

主要和次要结果测量

主要分析是对 2016 年 SSGAC 全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中测量的主观幸福感进行逆方差加权分析。次要结果包括在 SSGAC 中应用的多效稳健估计器和使用家庭内联盟 GWAS 的分析。

结果

我们没有发现强有力的证据表明幸福感(每生育一个孩子,标准偏差)会出现负向(β=-0.153(95%置信区间:-0.210 至 0.516))显著变化。次要结果通常略有缩小(例如,家庭内联盟为-0.049(95%置信区间:-0.533 至 0.435),加权中位数为 0.090(95%置信区间:-0.167 至 0.347)),这意味着存在一些残余混杂和多效性。

结论

与现有文献相反,我们的结果与生育子女数量对父母一生中平均幸福感的可衡量负面影响不一致。然而,我们无法探索非线性、交互作用或时变效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/a409e59c359c/genes-14-00716-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/406db7c37c1a/genes-14-00716-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/7bb2a6e63803/genes-14-00716-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/8b9b31d05ad1/genes-14-00716-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/a409e59c359c/genes-14-00716-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/406db7c37c1a/genes-14-00716-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/7bb2a6e63803/genes-14-00716-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/8b9b31d05ad1/genes-14-00716-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f9/10048211/a409e59c359c/genes-14-00716-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Lifetime Effect of Children on Wellbeing Using Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation.利用两样本孟德尔随机化探究儿童对幸福感的终生影响。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;14(3):716. doi: 10.3390/genes14030716.
2
Evaluation of the causal effects between subjective wellbeing and cardiometabolic health: mendelian randomisation study.主观幸福感与心脏代谢健康之间因果关系的评估:孟德尔随机化研究。
BMJ. 2018 Sep 25;362:k3788. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3788.
3
A data-driven approach for studying the role of body mass in multiple diseases: a phenome-wide registry-based case-control study in the UK Biobank.一种基于数据驱动的研究体重在多种疾病中作用的方法:英国生物库中基于表型全基因组注册的病例对照研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e116-e126. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30028-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Metabolic Traits and Stroke Risk in Individuals of African Ancestry: Mendelian Randomization Analysis.非洲裔个体的代谢特征与卒中风险:孟德尔随机化分析。
Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(8):2680-2684. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034747. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Circulating vitamin C concentration and risk of cancers: a Mendelian randomization study.循环维生素 C 浓度与癌症风险:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
BMC Med. 2021 Jul 30;19(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02041-1.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Association of maternal circulating 25(OH)D and calcium with birth weight: A mendelian randomisation analysis.母体循环 25(OH)D 和钙与出生体重的关联:孟德尔随机分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jun 18;16(6):e1002828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002828. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Smoking, alcohol consumption, and cancer: A mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank and international genetic consortia participants.吸烟、饮酒与癌症:英国生物银行和国际遗传联盟参与者的孟德尔随机化研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 23;17(7):e1003178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003178. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Education and coronary heart disease: mendelian randomisation study.教育与冠心病:孟德尔随机化研究
BMJ. 2017 Aug 30;358:j3542. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3542.
10
Associations between plasma fatty acid concentrations and schizophrenia: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study.血浆脂肪酸浓度与精神分裂症的关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;8(12):1062-1070. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00286-8. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of caffeine consumption behavior with plasma caffeine levels as exposure measures in drug-target mendelian randomization.在药物靶点孟德尔随机化中,将咖啡因摄入行为与血浆咖啡因水平作为暴露测量指标进行比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 2;193(12):1776-1784. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae143.
2
MRSamePopTest: introducing a simple falsification test for the two-sample mendelian randomisation 'same population' assumption.MRSamePop 检验:一种用于双样本孟德尔随机化“同人群”假设的简单伪造检验方法介绍。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Jan 17;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06684-0.

本文引用的文献

1
MRSamePopTest: introducing a simple falsification test for the two-sample mendelian randomisation 'same population' assumption.MRSamePop 检验:一种用于双样本孟德尔随机化“同人群”假设的简单伪造检验方法介绍。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Jan 17;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06684-0.
2
Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化
Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2022 Feb 10;2. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5.
3
Average Causal Effect Estimation Via Instrumental Variables: the No Simultaneous Heterogeneity Assumption.通过工具变量估计平均因果效应:无同时期异质性假设
Epidemiology. 2023 May 1;34(3):325-332. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001596. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
Stratification of individuals with lifetime depression and low wellbeing in the UK Biobank.在英国生物库中对有终身抑郁和低幸福感的个体进行分层。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Oct 1;314:281-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
Estimation of causal effects of a time-varying exposure at multiple time points through multivariable mendelian randomization.通过多变量孟德尔随机化估计多个时间点随时间变化的暴露因素的因果效应。
PLoS Genet. 2022 Jul 18;18(7):e1010290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010290. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Interpretation of Mendelian randomization using a single measure of an exposure that varies over time.使用随时间变化的暴露因素的单一测量值来解释孟德尔随机化。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):1899-1909. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac136.
7
Investigating the transparency of reporting in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization studies using the MR-Base platform.利用 MR-Base 平台调查两样本汇总数据 Mendelian 随机研究报告的透明度。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):1943-1956. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac074.
8
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration.加强流行病学中基于孟德尔随机化的观察性研究报告 (STROBE-MR): 解释和详述。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 26;375:n2233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2233.
9
Subjective Well-Being and Parenthood in Chile.智利的主观幸福感与育儿
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 11;18(14):7408. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147408.
10
Mendelian randomisation for psychiatry: how does it work, and what can it tell us?精神医学中的孟德尔随机化:它是如何运作的,又能告诉我们什么?
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):53-57. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01173-3. Epub 2021 Jun 4.