Institute for Sustainable Environment, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.
School of Individualized Study, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(6):4811. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064811.
This study evaluated the use of a long-term capillary flow controller paired with an evacuated canister for indoor air exposure monitoring in a vapor intrusion (VI) environment with trichloroethylene in comparison to the traditional method utilizing a diaphragm flow controller. Traditionally, air sampling with 6 L evacuated canisters equipped with diaphragm flow controllers has been best suited for 8 to 24 h samples. New advances in capillary flow controllers can extend sampling to up to 3 weeks by reducing flow rates to 0.1 milliliters min. During six 2 wk sampling events, conventional diaphragm flow controller canisters were used to collect 24 h samples simultaneously with capillary flow controllers collecting 2 wk samples. Testing was performed at four indoor locations in buildings impacted by VI with co-located samples for each method at each location. All samples were analyzed using GC/MS, and the results were statistically analyzed to produce a direct comparison of the two sampling systems. Ninety-two percent of the 14 d capillary samples were within the 95% levels of agreement of the average concentration of the diaphragm flow controllers. The ability to collect 14 days of data, with less occupant disturbance, allows for improved exposure assessments and thus improved risk management decisions.
本研究评估了在三氯乙烯的蒸气入侵 (VI) 环境中,与传统的使用隔膜流量控制器的方法相比,将长期毛细管流量控制器与抽空罐配对用于室内空气暴露监测的效果。传统上,配备有隔膜流量控制器的 6 L 抽空罐的空气采样最适合 8 至 24 小时的采样。毛细管流量控制器的新进展可以通过将流速降低至 0.1 毫升/分钟,将采样时间延长至长达 3 周。在六次为期 2 周的采样事件中,同时使用传统的隔膜流量控制器罐收集 24 小时的样品,同时使用毛细管流量控制器收集 2 周的样品。在受 VI 影响的建筑物中的四个室内地点进行了测试,在每个地点为每种方法都采集了共置样本。所有样品均使用 GC/MS 进行分析,并对结果进行了统计分析,以直接比较两种采样系统。在 14 天的毛细管样品中,有 92%的样品与隔膜流量控制器的平均浓度的 95%置信区间一致。能够收集 14 天的数据,减少了对居住者的干扰,可以进行更准确的暴露评估,从而做出更好的风险管理决策。