Suppr超能文献

坐位踏步和握手作为心肺运动试验的可行性:一项初步研究。

Feasibility of Seated Stepping and Handshaking as a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Imashiro Kyosuke, Nishioka Yasuko, Teramura Kenzo, Hashimoto Hiromi, Kimura Hiroki, Tanabe Naoya, Taniguchi Yasuhiro, Nakai Koya, Umemoto Yasunori, Ito Tomoyuki, Tajima Fumihiro, Mikami Yasuo

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8509, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation, Kyoto Konoe Rehabilitation Hospital, 26 Yoshidakonoecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8315, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 9;12(6):2140. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062140.

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary function is usually assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) using a cycle ergometer (CE-CPX) or a treadmill, which is difficult in patients with lower extremity motor dysfunction. A stepping and handshaking (SHS) exercise has been developed that can be performed safely and easily while sitting on a chair. This study compared peak oxygen uptake (peak V.O2) between CE-CPX and SHS-CPX in healthy adults and investigated the safety and validity of SHS-CPX. Twenty young adults (mean age 27.8 ± 4.4 years) were randomly assigned to perform CE-CPX or SHS-CPX, with the other test to follow 1-2 weeks later. The peak V.O2, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), peak heart rate, blood pressure, and test completion time were compared between CE-CPX and SHS-CPX. All subjects completed the examination and met the criteria for peak V.O2. SHS-CPX and CE-CPX showed a strong correlation with peak V.O2 (r = 0.85, < 0.0001). The peak V.O2 (40.4 ± 11.3 mL/min/kg vs. 28.9 ± 8.0 mL/min/kg), peak heart rate (190.6 ± 8.9 bpm vs. 172.1 ± 12.6 bpm), and test completion time (1052.8 ± 143.7 s vs. 609.1 ± 96.2 s) were significantly lower in the SHS-CPX ( < 0.0001). There were no adverse events. The peak V.O2 with SHS-CPX was equivalent to about 70% of that with CE-CPX despite the exercise being performed in a sitting position, suggesting its suitability as a submaximal exercise test.

摘要

心肺功能通常通过使用自行车测力计(CE-CPX)或跑步机的心肺运动测试(CPX)来评估,这对于下肢运动功能障碍的患者来说是困难的。已经开发出一种踏步和握手(SHS)运动,患者坐在椅子上就能安全、轻松地进行。本研究比较了健康成年人中CE-CPX和SHS-CPX的峰值摄氧量(peak V.O2),并研究了SHS-CPX的安全性和有效性。20名年轻成年人(平均年龄27.8±4.4岁)被随机分配进行CE-CPX或SHS-CPX,另一项测试在1-2周后进行。比较了CE-CPX和SHS-CPX之间的peak V.O2、呼吸交换率(RER)、峰值心率、血压和测试完成时间。所有受试者均完成检查并达到peak V.O2标准。SHS-CPX和CE-CPX与peak V.O2显示出很强的相关性(r = 0.85,<0.0001)。SHS-CPX的peak V.O2(40.4±11.3 mL/min/kg vs. 28.9±8.0 mL/min/kg)、峰值心率(190.6±8.9次/分钟 vs. 172.1±12.6次/分钟)和测试完成时间(1052.8±143.7秒 vs. 609.1±96.2秒)显著更低(<0.0001)。未发生不良事件。尽管SHS-CPX是在坐姿下进行的运动,但其peak V.O2约相当于CE-CPX的70%,表明其适合作为次极量运动测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c09/10057871/2474f22af0e1/jcm-12-02140-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验