• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吕贝克药物满意度问卷——一种用于治疗满意度的新型测量工具。

The Lübeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire-A Novel Measurement Tool for Therapy Satisfaction.

作者信息

Matrisch Ludwig, Rau Yannick, Karsten Hendrik, Graßhoff Hanna, Riemekasten Gabriela

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Universität zu Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine, Universität zu Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):505. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030505.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13030505
PMID:36983687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10058402/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapy satisfaction is widely considered an important aspect of clinical care. Still, there are currently no freely available questionnaires for its measurement. We developed the Lübeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (LMSQ) for that purpose. Here, we present its content and psychometric properties.

METHODS

The LMSQ was validated on 86 patients in a single center study. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test, confirmatory factor analysis, covariance analysis, and a test of exact fit were performed. Reliability was tested using Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. The relationship to other patient-reported outcomes was tested using Pearson's correlation.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factors analysis yielded moderate factor loadings with < 0.001 in all subscales. Reliability was adequate (α = 0.857 and ω = 0.872). Model fitness was excellent in all tests. The LMSQ was positively correlated with medication adherence (r = 0.603, < 0.001) and most dimensions of health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The LMSQ possesses adequate psychometric properties for its purpose. We recommend further validation in a more diverse patient collective.

摘要

背景

治疗满意度被广泛认为是临床护理的一个重要方面。然而,目前尚无免费可得的用于测量治疗满意度的问卷。我们为此开发了吕贝克药物满意度问卷(LMSQ)。在此,我们介绍其内容和心理测量特性。

方法

在一项单中心研究中,对86名患者进行了LMSQ验证。进行了凯泽 - 迈耶 - 奥尔金检验、验证性因子分析、协方差分析和精确拟合检验。使用克朗巴赫α系数和麦克唐纳ω系数检验信度。使用皮尔逊相关性检验其与其他患者报告结局的关系。

结果

验证性因子分析在所有子量表中产生了中等因子载荷,P < 0.001。信度良好(α = 0.857,ω = 0.872)。在所有测试中模型拟合度都非常好。LMSQ与药物依从性呈正相关(r = 0.603,P < 0.001),与健康素养的大多数维度也呈正相关。

结论

LMSQ具有适用于其目的的心理测量特性。我们建议在更多样化的患者群体中进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0178/10058402/08284f4ee7ac/jpm-13-00505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0178/10058402/08284f4ee7ac/jpm-13-00505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0178/10058402/08284f4ee7ac/jpm-13-00505-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Lübeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire-A Novel Measurement Tool for Therapy Satisfaction.吕贝克药物满意度问卷——一种用于治疗满意度的新型测量工具。
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):505. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030505.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.
3
Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the Morisky, Green and Levine (MGL) adherence scale.翻译并验证 Morisky、Green 和 Levine(MGL)依从性量表的阿拉伯语版本。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275778. eCollection 2022.
4
Validity of the Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES) in patients with epilepsy in Uganda.乌干达癫痫患者个人影响量表(PIES)的有效性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt B):107303. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107303. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale cross-culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese.Mackey 分娩满意度量表经跨文化调适后用于巴西葡萄牙语的心理测量学特性。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jul;34(13):2173-2179. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1660763. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
6
Reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication among Portuguese-speaking Brazilian patients with hypertension.巴西葡萄牙语高血压患者用药治疗满意度问卷的信效度研究
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1931-40. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13282. Epub 2016 May 2.
7
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.中文版 Morisky 药物依从性量表八条目版在系统性红斑狼疮中国患者中的信度和效度。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;41(9):2713-2720. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06195-y. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
[Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].[《身体形态问卷》法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82383-8.
9
[Design and validation of an instrument about quality of the advance care planning for professionals].[专业人员临终关怀计划质量评估工具的设计与验证]
Gac Sanit. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.11.002. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
10
Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease.使用全国慢性病小组研究对一种治疗满意度通用测量工具——药物治疗满意度问卷(TSQM)进行验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 26;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Measure Treatment Satisfaction in Drug Development.患者报告结局在药物研发中测量治疗满意度的作用。
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):603-617. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00702-w. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Patients' satisfaction with cancer pain treatment at adult oncologic centers in Northern Ethiopia; a multi-center cross-sectional study.患者对埃塞俄比亚北部成人肿瘤中心癌症疼痛治疗的满意度:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 27;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12359-7.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 pandemic impairs medical care of vasculitis patients in Germany: Results of a national patient survey.新冠疫情损害德国血管炎患者的医疗护理:一项全国患者调查结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:1103694. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1103694. eCollection 2022.
2
Therapy satisfaction and health literacy are key factors to improve medication adherence in systemic sclerosis.治疗满意度和健康素养是提高系统性硬化症患者药物依从性的关键因素。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Jul;52(4):395-402. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2022.2111771. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
Changes in Treatment Satisfaction Over 3 Years in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Initiating Second-line Treatment.
接受二线治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者治疗满意度 3 年变化。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Aug 18;107(9):2424-2432. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac420.
4
The Relation of Patient Expectations, Satisfaction, and Outcome in Surgery of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective Study.颈椎手术中患者期望、满意度和结局的关系:一项前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 15;47(12):849-858. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004351. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Exploring a New Theoretical Model to Explain the Behavior of Medication Adherence.探索一种新的理论模型以解释药物依从性的行为。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;10(2):43. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10020043.
6
Delay or avoidance of routine, urgent and emergency medical care due to concerns about COVID-19 in a region with low COVID-19 prevalence: Victoria, Australia.在新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)患病率较低的地区(澳大利亚维多利亚州),由于对COVID-19的担忧而导致常规、紧急和急诊医疗服务的延迟或被规避。
Respirology. 2021 Jul;26(7):707-712. doi: 10.1111/resp.14094. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
7
What too strict a method obscures about the validity of outcome measures.过于严格的方法掩盖了结果测量的有效性。
Psychother Res. 2021 Sep;31(7):882-894. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1865584. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Perceived Treatment Satisfaction and Effectiveness Facilitators Among Patients With Chronic Health Conditions: A Self-Reported Survey.慢性健康状况患者对治疗满意度及疗效促进因素的自我报告调查
Interact J Med Res. 2020 Mar 6;9(1):e13029. doi: 10.2196/13029.
9
Satisfaction with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment: results from a multicenter, observational study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的满意度:一项多中心观察性研究的结果。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753466619888128. doi: 10.1177/1753466619888128.
10
[Evaluation of satisfaction with pharmacological treatment in people with hypertension].[高血压患者药物治疗满意度评估]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Oct 30;93:e201910080.