Suppr超能文献

评估疗效的最佳万古霉素治疗药物监测参数是什么?对实验数据的批判性综述及对个体患者最低抑菌浓度值需求的评估。

What Is the Best Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Parameter to Assess Efficacy? A Critical Review of Experimental Data and Assessment of the Need for Individual Patient Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Value.

作者信息

Dalton Bruce R

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 24;11(3):567. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11030567.

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended for the use of vancomycin, but a recent widely publicized US medical society consensus statement has changed the suggested optimal method(s) of dose adjustment. Specifically, 24 h area under the curve (AUC)-based monitoring is has been recommended for vancomycin in preference to monitoring of trough concentrations. One reason cited for this change is the claim that AUC is a superior correlate to efficacy than trough (Cmin). Evidence from a number of retrospective analyses have been critically reviewed and determined to have weaknesses. This narrative review focuses on the experimental studies performed in vivo in animal models of infection and in vitro to determine the extent to which these data may provide a compelling distinction between pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PKPD) parameters that may translate to clinical use in therapeutic drug monitoring. Animal in vivo studies have been presented at conferences, but no original peer reviewed studies could be found that compare various PKPD parameters. These conference proceeding findings were supportive but unconvincing, even though they were favorably presented subsequently in review articles and clinical practice guidelines. In vitro data are somewhat conflicting, but the range of concentrations may play a role in the discrepancies found. It has been suggested that MIC may be assumed to have a value of 1 mg/L; however, it can be demonstrated that this assumption may lead to considerable discrepancy from results with an actual MIC value. The AUC parameter has been weighed against the percentage of time above the MIC (%T > MIC) as a comparative PKPD parameter, yet this may be an inappropriate comparison for vancomycin since all clinically useful dosing provides 100% T > MIC. Regardless, there is a distinction between clinical TDM parameters and PKPD parameters, so, in practice, the change to AUC:MIC based on animal experiments and in vitro evidence for vancomycin may be premature.

摘要

建议对万古霉素的使用进行治疗药物监测,但美国一个医学协会最近一份广泛宣传的共识声明改变了建议的最佳剂量调整方法。具体而言,已建议对万古霉素采用基于24小时曲线下面积(AUC)的监测,而非谷浓度监测。此次改变所引用的一个原因是,声称AUC与疗效的相关性优于谷浓度(Cmin)。对多项回顾性分析的证据进行了严格审查,发现存在缺陷。本叙述性综述重点关注在感染动物模型体内和体外进行的实验研究,以确定这些数据在多大程度上能有力地区分可转化为治疗药物监测临床应用的药代动力学/药效学(PKPD)参数。动物体内研究已在会议上展示,但未找到比较各种PKPD参数的经同行评审的原创研究。这些会议论文的研究结果虽有支持性但并不令人信服,尽管它们随后在综述文章和临床实践指南中得到了有利呈现。体外数据存在一定冲突,但浓度范围可能在发现的差异中起作用。有人建议可假设最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值为1mg/L;然而,可以证明这种假设可能导致与实际MIC值的结果存在相当大的差异。AUC参数已与高于MIC的时间百分比(%T > MIC)作为比较性PKPD参数进行权衡,但这对万古霉素可能是不恰当的比较,因为所有临床有效的给药方案都能提供100%的%T > MIC。无论如何,临床治疗药物监测参数和PKPD参数之间存在区别,因此,在实践中,基于动物实验和体外证据将万古霉素的监测改为基于AUC:MIC可能为时过早。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验