反流症状评分量表韩文版的翻译及验证。

Translation and validation of the Korean Version of the Reflux Symptom Score.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies, Paris, France; Department of Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Mons School of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Voice. 2024 Mar;38(2):545.e1-545.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.026. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.026

PMID:34656394

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the reflux symptom score (K-RSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The English version of the RSS was translated into Korean and completed by 77 people (44 and 33 people in the patient group and control group, respectively). They completed the K-RSS (K-RSS-1) and reflux symptom index (RSI) questionnaires and answered questions about age, sex, underlying disease, smoking history, and alcohol and coffee consumption. They completed the K-RSS once more (K-RSS-2) after 1 - 2 weeks. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). External validity was evaluated using the Spearman rank test between the RSI and K-RSS. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess internal validity by comparing the K-RSS-1 scores between the patient and control groups.

RESULTS

The most common symptoms were globus sensation, throat clearing, and throat pain. The K-RSS reported high internal consistency (α = 0.894). The ICC for the total score was 0.883, indicating excellent test-retest reliability. According to the Spearman analysis, there was a significant correlation between the total score of the K-RSS and that of the RSI (rs = 0.902; P < 0.001), demonstrating strong external validity. Furthermore, the patient group showed significantly higher values than the control group in all K-RSS scores, suggesting high internal validity.

CONCLUSION

The K-RSS is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire with excellent criterion-referenced validity and ideal reliability.

摘要

目的

评估反流症状评分（K-RSS）的韩文版本的有效性和可靠性。

材料与方法

将 RSS 的英文版本翻译成韩文，并由 77 人（分别为 44 名和 33 名患者组和对照组）完成。他们完成了 K-RSS（K-RSS-1）和反流症状指数（RSI）问卷，并回答了有关年龄、性别、基础疾病、吸烟史以及咖啡和酒精消费的问题。他们在 1-2 周后再次完成 K-RSS（K-RSS-2）。使用 Cronbach 的 α 评估内部一致性，使用组内相关系数（ICC）评估测试-重测可靠性。使用 Spearman 秩检验评估 RSI 与 K-RSS 之间的外部有效性。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验通过比较患者组和对照组的 K-RSS-1 评分来评估内部有效性。

结果

最常见的症状是咽部异物感、清嗓和咽痛。K-RSS 报告了较高的内部一致性（α=0.894）。总分的 ICC 为 0.883，表明测试-重测可靠性非常好。根据 Spearman 分析，K-RSS 总分与 RSI 之间存在显著相关性（rs=0.902；P<0.001），表明具有很强的外部有效性。此外，患者组在所有 K-RSS 评分中均显著高于对照组，表明具有很高的内部有效性。