• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单双节段腰椎融合手术管理的最佳康复路径:一项改良 Delphi 研究。

Best practice rehabilitation pathway for the management of single and double-level lumbar fusion surgery: a modified Delphi Study.

机构信息

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium -

REVAL Rehabilitation Research, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium -

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):377-385. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07735-3. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07735-3
PMID:36988564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence to guide the rehabilitation of patients following single or double-level lumbar fusion surgery (LFS). This is reflected in extensive variability in current rehabilitation regimes and subsequent low clinical success rates, which urges a call for a consensus rehabilitation pathway.

AIM

To establish consensus on the optimal pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS.

DESIGN

A modified Delphi Study.

SETTING

Belgium and the Netherlands.

POPULATION

A multidisciplinary panel of 31 experts in the field of LFS and rehabilitation participated. Nine patients validated the consensus pathway.

METHODS

A three-round online Delphi questionnaire was followed by an in-person consensus meeting. In each round, experts could suggest new statements, and received group summary statistics and feedback for reconsidered statements. Consensus threshold was set at ≥75% agreement. The resulting rehabilitation pathway was validated by patients through an online questionnaire and subsequent in-person focus group.

RESULTS

A total of 31 experts participated in the first online round, with 27 (87%) completing all online rounds, and 17 (55%) attending the in-person consensus meeting. Consensus was reached on 122 statements relating to pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation of LFS, and validated by patients. Key components of the rehabilitation pathway included prehabilitation, education, physiotherapy in every phase, early postoperative mobilization, and little movement restrictions. Patients emphasized the need for support during the return-to-work process.

CONCLUSIONS

This process resulted in 122 expert-consensus statements on best practice rehabilitation for managing LFS, validated by patients.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

The proposed rehabilitation pathway can serve as guidance to support clinicians, reduce practice variability, and subsequently improve clinical outcomes after LFS.

摘要

背景

目前仅有有限的证据可以指导单节段或双节段腰椎融合术(LFS)后的患者康复。这反映在当前康复方案的高度变异性和随后的低临床成功率上,因此迫切需要建立一个共识的康复途径。

目的

确定 LFS 术前、术中和术后最佳康复的共识。

设计

改良 Delphi 研究。

地点

比利时和荷兰。

人群

由 31 名 LFS 和康复领域的多学科专家组成的小组参与。9 名患者验证了共识途径。

方法

进行了三轮在线 Delphi 问卷调查,随后进行了一次面对面的共识会议。在每一轮中,专家可以提出新的陈述,并且会收到小组汇总统计数据和重新审议的陈述的反馈。共识阈值设定为≥75%的一致性。通过患者在线问卷调查和随后的面对面焦点小组,验证了由此产生的康复途径。

结果

共有 31 名专家参加了第一轮在线调查,其中 27 名(87%)完成了所有在线轮次,17 名(55%)参加了面对面的共识会议。就 LFS 术前、术中和术后康复达成了 122 项共识声明,并得到了患者的验证。康复途径的关键组成部分包括术前康复、教育、各阶段的物理治疗、早期术后活动以及较少的运动限制。患者强调了在重返工作岗位过程中需要得到支持。

结论

通过该过程,针对 LFS 管理的最佳实践康复达成了 122 项专家共识声明,并得到了患者的验证。

临床康复影响

所提出的康复途径可以作为指导,支持临床医生,减少实践中的变异性,并随后提高 LFS 后的临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d2/10272932/d65c2cf62b5d/7735-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d2/10272932/f43450000798/7735-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d2/10272932/d65c2cf62b5d/7735-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d2/10272932/f43450000798/7735-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d2/10272932/d65c2cf62b5d/7735-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Best practice rehabilitation pathway for the management of single and double-level lumbar fusion surgery: a modified Delphi Study.单双节段腰椎融合手术管理的最佳康复路径:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Jun;59(3):377-385. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07735-3. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Development of Prehabilitation and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Expert-Based Delphi Consensus.老年择期腰椎融合手术患者术前康复与术后加速康复方案的制定:基于专家的德尔菲共识
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jun;198:123975. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123975. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Developing and Tailoring a Person-Centred Pathway for Mental Health Care for People Receiving Dialysis.为接受透析治疗的患者制定并量身定制以患者为中心的心理健康护理路径。
Nephron. 2025;149(7):392-410. doi: 10.1159/000544058. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
5
Multidisciplinary collaborative guidance on the assessment and treatment of patients with Long COVID: A compendium statement.关于长新冠患者评估与治疗的多学科协作指南:一份概要声明
PM R. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13397.
6
Global Delphi consensus on treatment goals for generalized pustular psoriasis.关于泛发性脓疱型银屑病治疗目标的全球德尔菲共识。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):706-716. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae491.
7
Developing Balanced Quality Indicators for Monitoring Virtual Care in Ambulatory Care Environments: Modified Delphi Panel Process.制定用于监测门诊护理环境中虚拟护理的平衡质量指标:改良德尔菲专家小组法
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e38657. doi: 10.2196/38657.
8
Building consensus: development of a best practice guideline (BPG) for avoiding errors in robotic-assisted spine surgery (RASS).建立共识:制定避免机器人辅助脊柱手术(RASS)错误的最佳实践指南(BPG)。
Spine Deform. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01060-9.
9
Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.临床指南和支付方政策对慢性下腰痛融合治疗的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4.
10
Consensus-based development and practice testing of a generic quality indicator set for parenteral medication administration at home: a RAND appropriateness method study.基于共识的居家肠外给药通用质量指标集的开发与实践测试:一项兰德适宜性方法研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 1;15(7):e090496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090496.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic exercise following lumbar spine surgery: a narrative review.腰椎手术后的治疗性运动:一项叙述性综述。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 May 30;23:100620. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100620. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Infinity Loop of Healthcare Innovation: Development of an Integrated Rehabilitation Pathway for Lumbar Fusion Surgery Through Design Thinking.医疗保健创新的无限循环:通过设计思维开发腰椎融合手术的综合康复路径。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 May 12;25(2):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7765. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Early functional training is not superior to routine rehabilitation in improving walking distance and multifidus atrophy after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of spinal surgery in the treatment of low back pain.脊柱手术在腰痛治疗中的作用。
Med J Aust. 2023 Jan 16;218(1):40-45. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51788. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
2
Low-value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward?肌肉骨骼健康照护中的低价值医疗:是否有前进的道路?
Pain Pract. 2022 Sep;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):65-70. doi: 10.1111/papr.13142.
3
A qualitative evaluation of participants experiences of living with back pain, lumbar fusion surgery, and post-operative rehabilitation.对背痛、腰椎融合手术及术后康复患者生活体验的质性评估。
早期功能训练在改善腰椎融合术后步行距离和多裂肌萎缩方面并不优于常规康复:一项为期6个月随访的随机对照试验。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Apr 18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08771-7.
4
Cost-Utility Analysis of a pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway versus usual care in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.腰椎融合手术患者术前、术中和术后康复路径与常规护理的成本-效用分析
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 26;5:104221. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104221. eCollection 2025.
5
A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (REACT): a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.腰椎融合手术的术前、围手术期和术后康复路径(REACT):一项非随机对照临床试验。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Apr;34(4):1513-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
6
Qualitative study exploring the views of patients and healthcare providers on current rehabilitation practices after lumbar fusion surgery.一项定性研究,旨在探讨患者和医疗保健提供者对腰椎融合手术后当前康复实践的看法。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e077786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077786.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Apr 25;8(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01050-y.
4
Rehabilitation to improve outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis.康复治疗改善腰椎融合手术结局:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Jun;31(6):1525-1545. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07158-2. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Exploring Associations of Preoperative Physical Performance With Postoperative Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning Approach.运用机器学习方法探究腰椎融合术后术前体能与术后结局的相关性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Jul;102(7):1324-1330.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Trends in lumbar spinal fusion-a literature review.腰椎融合术的发展趋势——文献综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):752-761. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-492.
7
Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.腰椎融合术围手术期护理的共识声明:加速康复外科(ERAS®)协会建议。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):729-752. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
The Impact of Obesity on Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Elective Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion.肥胖对择期后路腰椎融合术患者不良结局风险因素的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Apr 1;46(7):457-463. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003812.
9
Development and validation of a prediction tool for pain reduction in adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion: a multicentre cohort study.成人择期腰椎融合术后疼痛减轻预测工具的开发和验证:一项多中心队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1909-1916. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06473-w. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Preoperative Mental Health Component Scoring Is Related to Patient Reported Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion.术前心理健康评分与腰椎融合术后患者报告的结局相关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 15;45(12):798-803. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003399.