Haupt Franziska, Kanzow Philipp
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Apr 18;12:e46305. doi: 10.2196/46305.
Dental undergraduate students are required to show sufficient practical skills prior to treating patients. Practical skills and the underlying theoretical knowledge are taught in preclinical courses. Usually, the learning outcome is assessed in written multiple-choice examinations (theoretical knowledge) and practical skills tests. However, students' assessment of practical skills is more time consuming and prone to bias than objective multiple-choice examinations.
This study aims to analyze the relation between students' theoretical knowledge and practical skills in endodontics. Furthermore, the predictive validity of a theoretical knowledge assessment on students' practical skills was assessed.
Examination results from all students who participated in the preclinical phantom course in Operative Dentistry (sixth semester of the undergraduate dental curriculum in Germany) between the 2015 summer term and the 2022 summer term were retrospectively evaluated (N=447). The effects of age, sex, previous course participation, and theoretical knowledge on students' practical skills were assessed, using Pearson correlations, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and a linear regression analysis. Subsequently, students' theoretical knowledge and practical skills were compared via a Fisher exact test to identify a suitable pass mark for students' theoretical knowledge that was associated with sufficient practical skills (≥60%).
Students' theoretical knowledge was significantly associated with practical skills (P=.02; r=0.13). By using the current pass mark for theoretical knowledge (ie, 60%), a significant differentiation between insufficient practical skills (<60%) and sufficient practical skills (≥60%) was achieved (P=.02). However, for the discrimination between students with sufficient practical skills and students with insufficient practical skills, an adapted pass mark for theoretical knowledge would be more appropriate. The ideal pass mark amounted to 58% (P=.02).
Students' practical skills and theoretical knowledge are significantly correlated. By objectively measuring students' theoretical knowledge, a rough estimation of students' practical skills (ie, a differentiation between sufficient and insufficient practical skills) is possible.
牙科本科学生在治疗患者之前需要具备足够的实践技能。实践技能和相关理论知识在临床前课程中教授。通常,学习成果通过书面多项选择题考试(理论知识)和实践技能测试进行评估。然而,与客观的多项选择题考试相比,对学生实践技能的评估更耗时且容易出现偏差。
本研究旨在分析学生在牙髓病学方面的理论知识与实践技能之间的关系。此外,还评估了理论知识评估对学生实践技能的预测效度。
回顾性评估了2015年夏季学期至2022年夏季学期期间参加口腔手术临床前模拟课程(德国牙科本科课程第六学期)的所有学生的考试成绩(N = 447)。使用Pearson相关性分析、Wilcoxon秩和检验和线性回归分析评估年龄、性别、之前课程参与情况和理论知识对学生实践技能的影响。随后,通过Fisher精确检验比较学生的理论知识和实践技能,以确定与足够实践技能(≥60%)相关的学生理论知识的合适及格分数。
学生的理论知识与实践技能显著相关(P = 0.02;r = 0.13)。使用当前理论知识的及格分数(即60%),在实践技能不足(<60%)和实践技能足够(≥60%)之间实现了显著区分(P = 0.02)。然而,对于区分实践技能足够的学生和实践技能不足的学生,理论知识的调整及格分数会更合适。理想的及格分数为58%(P = 0.02)。
学生的实践技能和理论知识显著相关。通过客观测量学生的理论知识,可以对学生的实践技能进行大致估计(即区分实践技能足够和不足)。