• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不止于言语?突出目标人群如何影响公众对医疗补助计划的看法。

More Than Words? How Highlighting Target Populations Affects Public Opinion about the Medicaid Program.

作者信息

Haeder Simon F, Sylvester Steven M, Callaghan Timothy

机构信息

Texas A&M University.

Utah Valley University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Oct 1;48(5):713-760. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10637708.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-10637708
PMID:36995367
Abstract

CONTEXT

The Medicaid program provides health insurance coverage to a diverse set of demographics. We know little about how the policy community describes these populations (e.g., on Medicaid-related websites or in public opinion polls and policy writings) or whether and how these descriptions may affect perceptions of the program, its beneficiaries, and potential policy changes.

METHODS

To investigate this issue, we developed and fielded a nationally representative survey of 2,680 Americans that included an experiment for priming respondents by highlighting different combinations of target populations of the Medicaid program as found in the Medicaid policy discourse.

FINDINGS

Overall, we find that Americans view Medicaid and its beneficiaries rather favorably. However, there are marked differences based on partisanship and racial animosity. Emphasizing citizenship and residency requirements at times improved these perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial perceptions and partisanship are important correlates in Americans' views about Medicaid and its beneficiaries. However, perceptions are not immutable. In general, the policy community should shift toward using more comprehensive descriptions of the Medicaid population that go beyond the focus on low income and that include citizenship and residency requirements. Future research should expand this work by studying descriptions in the broader public discourse.

摘要

背景

医疗补助计划为各种各样的人群提供医疗保险。我们对政策界如何描述这些人群(例如,在与医疗补助相关的网站上,或在民意调查及政策文件中)知之甚少,也不清楚这些描述是否以及如何影响对该计划、其受益者以及潜在政策变化的看法。

方法

为了调查这个问题,我们开展并实施了一项对2680名美国人的具有全国代表性的调查,其中包括一项实验,通过突出医疗补助政策话语中发现的医疗补助计划目标人群的不同组合来引导受访者。

研究结果

总体而言,我们发现美国人对医疗补助及其受益者的看法颇为正面。然而,基于党派立场和种族敌意存在显著差异。有时强调公民身份和居住要求会改善这些看法。

结论

种族观念和党派立场是美国人对医疗补助及其受益者看法的重要相关因素。然而,看法并非一成不变。总体而言,政策界应转向使用对医疗补助人群更全面的描述,超越对低收入的关注,纳入公民身份和居住要求。未来的研究应通过研究更广泛公共话语中的描述来扩展这项工作。

相似文献

1
More Than Words? How Highlighting Target Populations Affects Public Opinion about the Medicaid Program.不止于言语?突出目标人群如何影响公众对医疗补助计划的看法。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Oct 1;48(5):713-760. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10637708.
2
Lingering Legacies: Public Attitudes about Medicaid Beneficiaries and Work Requirements.遗留问题:公众对医疗补助受益人和工作要求的态度。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):305-355. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802198.
3
The Politics of Medicaid: Most Americans Are Connected to the Program, Support Its Expansion, and Do Not View It as Stigmatizing.医疗补助计划的政治问题:大多数美国人与该计划有关联,支持其扩大,且不认为它带有污名化色彩。
Milbank Q. 2017 Dec;95(4):749-782. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12298.
4
Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.理解生物医学研究辩论中的公众舆论:超越政治党派之争,关注对科学与社会的信念。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088473. eCollection 2014.
5
Medicaid by Any Other Name? Investigating Malleability of Partisan Attitudes toward the Public Program. Medicaid 换个马甲?调查公众项目党派态度的可变性。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Jun 1;49(3):451-471. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11066320.
6
Ensuring the Future of the Affordable Care Act on the Health Insurance Marketplaces.确保平价医疗法案在医疗保险市场的未来
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Aug 1;44(4):589-630. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7530813.
7
Health Navigator Perspectives on Implementation of Healthy Michigan Plan Work Requirements.健康导航员视角下的《健康密歇根计划》工作要求实施情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 10;3(6):e221502. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1502. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Who Would Pay Higher Taxes for Better Mental Health? Results of a Large-Sample National Choice Experiment.谁愿意为改善心理健康支付更高的税款?一项大规模全国选择实验的结果。
Milbank Q. 2021 Sep;99(3):771-793. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12523. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
9
Americans' View of the Impact of COVID-19: Perspectives on Racial Impacts and Equity.美国人对 COVID-19 影响的看法:对种族影响和公平的看法。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Oct 1;46(5):889-924. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9156033.
10
Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America.美国的公众舆论与肥胖政治。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Oct;30(5):923-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-5-923.

引用本文的文献

1
Most Americans support minimizing administrative burdens for Medicaid recipients as the public health emergency ends.随着公共卫生紧急事件的结束,大多数美国人支持将医疗补助计划受益人的行政负担降至最低。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Jun 20;1(1):qxad001. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad001. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Assessing past and future COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States in light of federal policy changes.鉴于联邦政策变化评估美国过去和未来对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Dec 1;1(6):qxad073. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad073. eCollection 2023 Dec.