Wang Jing, Fang Shuanghu, Yang Chunying, Tang Xiaobin, Zhu Luosha, Nie Yu
School of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.
School of Special Education, Zhengzhou Normal University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Mar 24;16:997-1007. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S400757. eCollection 2023.
To explore the potential classification of psychological flexibility (PF) among Chinese college students, analyze whether there is group heterogeneity in PF, and discuss the differences in the latent profile of PF in the negative emotions of depression, anxiety, and stress.
A total of 1769 college students were investigated using the Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire and Depression-Anxiety-Stress Self-rating Scale, and heterogeneity was tested by latent profile analysis.
The PF of college students can be divided into three latent profiles: self-contradiction group (19.2%), high PF group (34.1%), and low PF group (46.7%). The scores of depression, anxiety, and stress are significantly different among the groups.
There is obvious group heterogeneity in the PF of college students, and they can be divided into the self-contradiction group, the high PF group, and the low PF group. The self-contradiction and low PF groups score significantly higher on the negative emotions of depression, anxiety, and stress than the high PF group.
探讨中国大学生心理灵活性（PF）的潜在分类，分析PF是否存在群体异质性，并探讨PF在抑郁、焦虑和压力等负面情绪方面潜在特征的差异。
采用心理灵活性问卷和抑郁-焦虑-压力自评量表对1769名大学生进行调查，并通过潜在剖面分析检验异质性。
大学生的PF可分为三个潜在剖面：自我矛盾组（19.2%）、高PF组（34.1%）和低PF组（46.7%）。各组在抑郁、焦虑和压力得分上存在显著差异。
大学生的PF存在明显的群体异质性，可分为自我矛盾组、高PF组和低PF组。自我矛盾组和低PF组在抑郁、焦虑和压力等负面情绪上的得分显著高于高PF组。
