• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对香港 COVID-19 预防行为疲劳的纵向研究:一个具有先前大流行经验的城市。

A longitudinal study of COVID-19 preventive behavior fatigue in Hong Kong: a city with previous pandemic experience.

机构信息

JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Collaborating Centre for Oxford University and CUHK for Disaster and Medical Humanitarian Response (CCOUC), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15257-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-15257-y
PMID:37004041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10064631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In addition to high vaccination levels, COVID-19 control requires uptake and continued adherence to personal hygiene and social distancing behaviors. It is unclear whether residents of a city with successive experience in worldwide pandemics such as SARS, would quickly adopt and maintain preventive behaviors.

METHODS

A population-based, longitudinal telephone survey was conducted between in first local wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020) and third local wave (December 2020) (n = 403). The study examined factors associated with personal hygiene and social distancing behavior fatigue, as measured by reduced adherence.

RESULTS

Over 9 months, face mask use increased (96.5-100%, p < 0.001). Although habitual hand hygiene remained unchanged (92.0%), blue collar workers and non-working individuals showed higher risk of hand hygiene fatigue. There was a decline (p < 0.05) in avoidance of social gatherings (81.1 to 70.7%), avoidance of public places (52.9-27.5%) and avoidance of international travel (81.9-77.4%) even with rising caseloads. Lowered perception of COVID-19 disease severity was associated with decreased avoidance of social gatherings and public places while lower education was associated with decline in avoidance of social gatherings.

CONCLUSION

Even in regions with past pandemic experience, maintaining social distancing behaviors during a protracted pandemic remains a major public health challenge.

摘要

背景

除了高疫苗接种率外,控制 COVID-19 还需要人们采取并坚持个人卫生和社会隔离措施。目前尚不清楚在经历过 SARS 等全球大流行的城市中,居民是否能够迅速采取并保持预防措施。

方法

在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波本地疫情(2020 年 4 月)和第三波本地疫情(2020 年 12 月)期间,进行了一项基于人群的纵向电话调查(n=403)。本研究调查了与个人卫生和社会隔离行为疲劳相关的因素,疲劳的衡量标准是行为的依从性降低。

结果

在 9 个月的时间里,口罩使用率上升(96.5-100%,p<0.001)。虽然习惯性手部卫生保持不变(92.0%),但蓝领工人和非工作者手部卫生疲劳的风险更高。避免社交聚会(81.1-70.7%)、避免公共场所(52.9-27.5%)和避免国际旅行(81.9-77.4%)的行为都有所下降(p<0.05),尽管病例数在不断上升。对 COVID-19 疾病严重程度的认知降低与避免社交聚会和公共场所的行为减少有关,而教育程度较低与避免社交聚会的行为减少有关。

结论

即使在有过去大流行经验的地区,在长时间的大流行期间保持社会隔离措施仍然是一个重大的公共卫生挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0a/10064744/04cc4ef4bc74/12889_2023_15257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0a/10064744/04cc4ef4bc74/12889_2023_15257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0a/10064744/04cc4ef4bc74/12889_2023_15257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A longitudinal study of COVID-19 preventive behavior fatigue in Hong Kong: a city with previous pandemic experience.一项针对香港 COVID-19 预防行为疲劳的纵向研究:一个具有先前大流行经验的城市。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15257-y.
2
Population Adherence to Infection Control Behaviors during Hong Kong's First and Third COVID-19 Waves: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study.香港第一波和第三波新冠疫情期间人群对感染控制行为的依从性:一项系列横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 24;18(21):11176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111176.
3
Comparing Public Perceptions and Preventive Behaviors During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Survey Study.比较 COVID-19 大流行早期香港和英国的公众认知和预防行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e23231. doi: 10.2196/23231.
4
Pandemic fatigue and attenuated impact of avoidance behaviours against COVID-19 transmission in Hong Kong by cross-sectional telephone surveys.通过横断面电话调查发现,香港的大流行疲劳和对 COVID-19 传播的回避行为的影响减弱。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e055909. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055909.
5
Sociodemographic Predictors of Health Risk Perception, Attitude and Behavior Practices Associated with Health-Emergency Disaster Risk Management for Biological Hazards: The Case of COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong, SAR China.与健康突发事件灾害风险管理相关的健康风险感知、态度和行为实践的社会人口学预测因素:以中国香港特别行政区 COVID-19 大流行为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 29;17(11):3869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113869.
6
Levels and factors of social and physical distancing based on the Theory of Planned Behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese adults.基于计划行为理论的中国成年人在新冠疫情期间社交及物理距离的水平与影响因素
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1179-1186. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa146.
7
The impact of mass gatherings on the local transmission of COVID-19 and the implications for social distancing policies: Evidence from Hong Kong.大型集会对 COVID-19 本地传播的影响及对社交距离政策的启示:来自香港的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 1;18(2):e0279539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279539. eCollection 2023.
8
Pandemic fatigue impedes mitigation of COVID-19 in Hong Kong.大流行疲劳阻碍香港 COVID-19 缓解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 29;119(48):e2213313119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213313119. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
9
Psychobehavioral Responses and Likelihood of Receiving COVID-19 Vaccines during the Pandemic, Hong Kong.疫情期间香港的心理行为反应和接种 COVID-19 疫苗的可能性。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;27(7):1802-1810. doi: 10.3201/eid2707.210054.
10
Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study.**题目**:在香港,新冠疫情期间电子健康素养和预防行为的社会经济差异:一项横断面研究。 **解析**:原文“Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study.”是一个较长的英文句子,翻译时需要注意断句和中文表达习惯。“eHealth Literacy”翻译为“电子健康素养”,“preventive behaviors”翻译为“预防行为”。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 14;23(4):e24577. doi: 10.2196/24577.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the dynamics and interplay of public support and adherence to five key mitigation behaviors over the course of the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.了解在不断演变的新冠疫情期间公众对五种关键缓解行为的支持动态及其相互作用。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jul 24;31:101847. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101847. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Tailoring dengue health communication: Survey-based strategies to reduce message fatigue across risk areas.定制登革热健康传播:基于调查的策略以减少各风险区域的信息疲劳
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 May 30;19(5):e0012723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012723. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Social distancing and mental health two years into a global pandemic: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods investigation in Hong Kong.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge of COVID-19 and Its Relationship with Preventive Behaviors and Vaccination among Adults in Northern Thailand's Community.泰国北部社区成年人对 COVID-19 的认知及其与预防行为和疫苗接种的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 28;19(3):1521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031521.
2
Associations of COVID-19 Knowledge and Risk Perception with the Full Adoption of Preventive Behaviors in Seoul.新冠肺炎知识和风险感知与首尔全面采取预防行为的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212102.
3
Community psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019 over one year of the pandemic in 2020 in Hong Kong.
全球大流行两年后的社交距离与心理健康:香港一项序贯探索性混合方法调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e092160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092160.
4
Adherence to COVID-19 measures and the associated factors: evidence from a two-wave longitudinal study in Singapore.遵守 COVID-19 措施及相关因素:来自新加坡两波纵向研究的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2839. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20256-8.
5
A Systematic Review of the Definition, Measurement, and Associated Factors of Pandemic Fatigue.大流行疲劳的定义、测量及相关因素的系统评价
China CDC Wkly. 2024 Sep 6;6(36):924-933. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.068.
6
Heterogeneous risk tolerance, in-groups, and epidemic waves.异质性风险承受能力、内群体与疫情波
Front Appl Math Stat. 2024;10. doi: 10.3389/fams.2024.1360001. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
7
The role of collectivism, liberty, COVID fatigue, and fatalism in public support for the zero-COVID policy and relaxing restrictions in China.集体主义、自由、COVID 疲劳和宿命论在公众对中国零 COVID 政策和放宽限制的支持中的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18331-1.
2020 年香港新冠肺炎疫情爆发一年期间的社区心理和行为反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 18;11(1):22480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00616-9.
4
Population Adherence to Infection Control Behaviors during Hong Kong's First and Third COVID-19 Waves: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study.香港第一波和第三波新冠疫情期间人群对感染控制行为的依从性:一项系列横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 24;18(21):11176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111176.
5
Social distancing in America: Understanding long-term adherence to COVID-19 mitigation recommendations.美国的社交距离措施:理解对 COVID-19 缓解建议的长期遵守情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257945. eCollection 2021.
6
A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue.一项针对 COVID-19 防护行为依从性变化和假设的大流行疲劳的全球评估。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1145-1160. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01181-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
7
Why Do Some Americans Resist COVID-19 Prevention Behavior? An Analysis of Issue Importance, Message Fatigue, and Reactance Regarding COVID-19 Messaging.为什么一些美国人抵制 COVID-19 预防行为?对 COVID-19 信息的问题重要性、信息疲劳和反应的分析。
Health Commun. 2022 Dec;37(14):1812-1819. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1920717. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Knowledge and preventive behaviors regarding COVID-19 in Bangladesh: A nationwide distribution.孟加拉国 COVID-19 相关知识和预防行为:全国分布。
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0251151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251151. eCollection 2021.
9
The Global Case-Fatality Rate of COVID-19 Has Been Declining Since May 2020.自 2020 年 5 月以来,全球 COVID-19 的病死率一直在下降。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Apr 21;104(6):2176-2184. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1496.
10
Evolving Epidemiological Characteristics of COVID-19 in Hong Kong From January to August 2020: Retrospective Study.2020年1月至8月香港新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学特征演变:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 16;23(4):e26645. doi: 10.2196/26645.