• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于早期识别医院获得性尿路感染风险患者的临床可解释机器学习模型。

Clinically explainable machine learning models for early identification of patients at risk of hospital-acquired urinary tract infection.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark; Business Intelligence and Analysis, The North Denmark Region, Denmark.

Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2024 Dec;154:112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.017
PMID:37004787
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) models for early identification of patients at risk of hospital-acquired urinary tract infection (HA-UTI) may enable timely and targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies. However, clinicians are often challenged in the interpretation of the predictive outcomes provided by the ML models, which often reach different performances.

AIM

To train ML models for predicting patients at risk of HA-UTI using available data from electronic health records at the time of hospital admission. This study focused on the performance of different ML models and clinical explainability.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated patient data representing 138,560 hospital admissions in the North Denmark Region from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018. Fifty-one health sociodemographic and clinical features were extracted as the full dataset, and χ test and expert knowledge were used for feature selection, resulting in two reduced datasets. Seven different ML models were trained and compared between the three datasets. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to support population- and patient-level explainability.

FINDINGS

The best-performing ML model was the neural network model based on the full dataset, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758. The neural network model was also the best-performing ML model based on the reduced datasets, with an AUC of 0.746. Clinical explainability was demonstrated with a SHAP summary and forceplot.

CONCLUSION

Within 24 h of hospital admission, the ML models were able to identify patients at risk of developing HA-UTI, providing new opportunities to develop efficient strategies for the prevention of HA-UTI. SHAP was used to demonstrate how risk predictions can be explained at individual patient level and for the patient population in general.

摘要

背景

机器学习 (ML) 模型可用于早期识别发生医院获得性尿路感染 (HA-UTI) 的高危患者,从而能够及时采取有针对性的预防和治疗策略。然而,临床医生通常难以理解 ML 模型提供的预测结果,因为这些结果的性能往往存在差异。

目的

使用患者入院时电子健康记录中的可用数据来训练用于预测 HA-UTI 风险的 ML 模型。本研究侧重于不同 ML 模型的性能和临床可解释性。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,调查了来自 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间丹麦北部地区的 138560 例住院患者的数据。提取了 51 个健康社会人口统计学和临床特征作为完整数据集,并使用 χ2 检验和专家知识进行特征选择,得到两个简化数据集。在这三个数据集中,训练了 7 种不同的 ML 模型并进行了比较。使用 SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) 方法来支持人群和个体水平的可解释性。

结果

基于完整数据集的神经网络模型是表现最佳的 ML 模型,曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.758。基于简化数据集,神经网络模型也是表现最佳的 ML 模型,AUC 为 0.746。通过 SHAP 总结和力图展示了临床可解释性。

结论

在入院后 24 小时内,ML 模型能够识别发生 HA-UTI 的高危患者,为开发高效的 HA-UTI 预防策略提供了新的机会。SHAP 用于展示如何在个体患者水平以及一般患者群体中解释风险预测。

相似文献

1
Clinically explainable machine learning models for early identification of patients at risk of hospital-acquired urinary tract infection.用于早期识别医院获得性尿路感染风险患者的临床可解释机器学习模型。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Dec;154:112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.017. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
Prediction of risk of acquiring urinary tract infection during hospital stay based on machine-learning: A retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习的住院期间尿路感染风险预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248636. eCollection 2021.
3
A study on the risk stratification for patients within 24 hours of admission for risk of hospital-acquired urinary tract infection using Bayesian network models.采用贝叶斯网络模型对入院 24 小时内患者发生医院获得性尿路感染风险的危险分层研究。
Health Informatics J. 2024 Jan-Mar;30(1):14604582241234232. doi: 10.1177/14604582241234232.
4
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Incidence rates of hospital-acquired urinary tract and bloodstream infections generated by automated compilation of electronically available healthcare data.利用电子医疗数据自动编译生成的医院获得性泌尿道和血流感染的发病率。
J Hosp Infect. 2015 Nov;91(3):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
6
Enhancing predictive accuracy for urinary tract infections post-pediatric pyeloplasty with explainable AI: an ensemble TabNet approach.使用可解释人工智能提高小儿肾盂成形术后尿路感染的预测准确性:一种集成TabNet方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 19;15(1):2455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82282-1.
7
Constructing a screening model to identify patients at high risk of hospital-acquired influenza on admission to hospital.构建一个筛查模型,以识别入院时医院获得性流感高危患者。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;13:1495794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1495794. eCollection 2025.
8
Automated surveillance system for hospital-acquired urinary tract infections in Denmark.丹麦医院获得性尿路感染的自动监测系统。
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Jul;93(3):290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Towards proactive palliative care in oncology: developing an explainable EHR-based machine learning model for mortality risk prediction.迈向肿瘤学积极的姑息治疗:开发基于可解释电子健康记录的机器学习模型进行死亡率风险预测。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 20;23(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01457-9.
10
Novel Strategies for Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infections at Admission: Implications for Nursing Care.新型策略预测入院相关医疗感染:对护理的启示。
Nurs Res. 2020 Sep/Oct;69(5):399-403. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000449.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in hospital infection prevention: an integrative review.医院感染预防中的人工智能:一项综合综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;13:1547450. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547450. eCollection 2025.
2
The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review.可解释人工智能(XAI)在电子健康记录研究中的应用:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 30;10:20552076241272657. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272657. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Advancing Patient Safety: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mitigating Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review.
推进患者安全:人工智能在减轻医疗相关感染方面的未来:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 6;12(19):1996. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191996.